TY - JOUR
T1 - First Annual Report for Robot-Assisted Surgery Based on the National Clinical Database 2019 in Japan
T2 - Report on Three Major Gastrointestinal Fields
AU - Takemasa, Ichiro
AU - Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
AU - Nishigori, Tatsuto
AU - Fujita, Takeo
AU - Makino, Tomoki
AU - Taniyama, Yusuke
AU - Terashima, Masanori
AU - Tokunaga, Masanori
AU - Matsuyama, Takatoshi
AU - Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
AU - Iwata, Noriko
AU - Katsuno, Hidetoshi
AU - Suda, Koichi
AU - Kinugasa, Yusuke
AU - Obama, Kazutaka
AU - Kamei, Takashi
AU - Uyama, Ichiro
AU - Watanabe, Masahiko
AU - Sakai, Yoshiharu
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery published by Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Aim: The adoption of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in Japan has progressed significantly since its initial approval in 2009. RAS gradually expanded into various surgical fields with 35 procedures now covered under Japan's national health insurance. This study provides an inaugural assessment of RAS outcomes for seven digestive procedures introduced in 2018. Methods: The Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery working group established an RAS registry integrating data from the National Clinical Database and additional RAS-specific records. The analysis focused on three major gastrointestinal fields: the esophagus, stomach, and rectum. Results: In 2019, 530 esophagectomies, 2295 gastrectomies, and 3269 proctectomies were performed. RAS for these procedures was characterized by relatively long operative times, low intraoperative blood loss, and very low conversion rates to open surgery (< 1%). Postoperative morbidity rates Grade IIIa or higher were 23.2% for esophagectomy, 4.9% for gastrectomy, and 9.4% for proctectomy. Length of postoperative hospital stay correlated with morbidity, though readmission (1.3%–3.1%) and postoperative mortality rates (0.3%–0.6%) remained low. The early nationwide implementation of RAS in Japan was marked by a high surgeon qualification rate (98.9%) and meticulous case selection; the DVSS Xi model accounted for 66.3% of robotic platforms used. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for ongoing surveillance and data-driven evaluation to ensure safe and effective implementation of RAS. Future longitudinal analyses will refine surgical quality, optimize resource allocation, and advance minimally invasive techniques. This study highlights the transformative potential of RAS in Japanese surgical practice and its alignment with global trends.
AB - Aim: The adoption of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in Japan has progressed significantly since its initial approval in 2009. RAS gradually expanded into various surgical fields with 35 procedures now covered under Japan's national health insurance. This study provides an inaugural assessment of RAS outcomes for seven digestive procedures introduced in 2018. Methods: The Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery working group established an RAS registry integrating data from the National Clinical Database and additional RAS-specific records. The analysis focused on three major gastrointestinal fields: the esophagus, stomach, and rectum. Results: In 2019, 530 esophagectomies, 2295 gastrectomies, and 3269 proctectomies were performed. RAS for these procedures was characterized by relatively long operative times, low intraoperative blood loss, and very low conversion rates to open surgery (< 1%). Postoperative morbidity rates Grade IIIa or higher were 23.2% for esophagectomy, 4.9% for gastrectomy, and 9.4% for proctectomy. Length of postoperative hospital stay correlated with morbidity, though readmission (1.3%–3.1%) and postoperative mortality rates (0.3%–0.6%) remained low. The early nationwide implementation of RAS in Japan was marked by a high surgeon qualification rate (98.9%) and meticulous case selection; the DVSS Xi model accounted for 66.3% of robotic platforms used. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for ongoing surveillance and data-driven evaluation to ensure safe and effective implementation of RAS. Future longitudinal analyses will refine surgical quality, optimize resource allocation, and advance minimally invasive techniques. This study highlights the transformative potential of RAS in Japanese surgical practice and its alignment with global trends.
KW - National Clinical Database
KW - annual report
KW - gastroenterological surgery
KW - registry
KW - robot-assisted surgery
KW - surgical outcome
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028261407
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028261407#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/ases.70220
DO - 10.1111/ases.70220
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105028261407
SN - 1758-5902
VL - 19
JO - Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
JF - Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
IS - 1
M1 - e70220
ER -