TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender difference in the transabdominal ultrasound findings of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm
AU - Sasaki, Yutaka
AU - Ishikawa, Takuya
AU - Kawashima, Hiroki
AU - Ohno, Eizaburo
AU - Shimoyama, Yoshie
AU - Ishikawa, Eri
AU - Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IAP and EPC
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Background: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumour that is mostly observed in young females. However, onset in males is also observed, and they do not necessarily present with typical findings. A comparison between male and female SPN patients focusing on the ultrasound findings was performed. Methods: Sixteen patients including 5 males who received transabdominal ultrasounds and were diagnosed with SPN based on their resected specimens were compared by sex in terms of the following: 1) age, 2) symptoms, 3) ultrasound findings, 4) preoperative ultrasound diagnoses, and 5) histology. Results: 1) The age was significantly higher in males (43 vs. 31, P = 0.004). 2) Symptoms were not observed in any of the males while 4/11 females were symptomatic (P = 0.245). 3) Tumour size was significantly smaller in males (20 mm vs. 33 mm, P = 0.014), and there was a higher percentage of cystic components in females (0% vs. 73%, P = 0.026). 4) SPN was listed as the first differential diagnosis in 9/11 females as opposed to 2/5 males (P = 0.139). 5) Cystic areas on the ultrasound corresponded to necrosis and hemorrhage. All cases showed expression of progesterone and androgen receptors regardless of sex. Conclusions: There were significant differences between male and female SPN patients in terms of age, tumour size, and presence of cystic components. Attention should be paid to the finding that onset in males was more common from middle age onwards in comparison to females and that a cystic component was not observed.
AB - Background: Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumour that is mostly observed in young females. However, onset in males is also observed, and they do not necessarily present with typical findings. A comparison between male and female SPN patients focusing on the ultrasound findings was performed. Methods: Sixteen patients including 5 males who received transabdominal ultrasounds and were diagnosed with SPN based on their resected specimens were compared by sex in terms of the following: 1) age, 2) symptoms, 3) ultrasound findings, 4) preoperative ultrasound diagnoses, and 5) histology. Results: 1) The age was significantly higher in males (43 vs. 31, P = 0.004). 2) Symptoms were not observed in any of the males while 4/11 females were symptomatic (P = 0.245). 3) Tumour size was significantly smaller in males (20 mm vs. 33 mm, P = 0.014), and there was a higher percentage of cystic components in females (0% vs. 73%, P = 0.026). 4) SPN was listed as the first differential diagnosis in 9/11 females as opposed to 2/5 males (P = 0.139). 5) Cystic areas on the ultrasound corresponded to necrosis and hemorrhage. All cases showed expression of progesterone and androgen receptors regardless of sex. Conclusions: There were significant differences between male and female SPN patients in terms of age, tumour size, and presence of cystic components. Attention should be paid to the finding that onset in males was more common from middle age onwards in comparison to females and that a cystic component was not observed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088122226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088122226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pan.2020.06.016
DO - 10.1016/j.pan.2020.06.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 32694007
AN - SCOPUS:85088122226
SN - 1424-3903
VL - 20
SP - 997
EP - 1003
JO - Pancreatology
JF - Pancreatology
IS - 5
ER -