TY - JOUR
T1 - Geometric discrepancy of image-guided radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer without implanted fiducial markers using a commercial pseudo-CT generation method
AU - Kan, Hirohito
AU - Eguchi, Yuta
AU - Tsuchiya, Takahiro
AU - Kondo, Takuto
AU - Kitagawa, Yuto
AU - Mekata, Yuji
AU - Fukuma, Hiroshi
AU - Yoshida, Ryoya
AU - Kasai, Harumasa
AU - Kunitomo, Hiroshi
AU - Hirose, Yasujiro
AU - Shibamoto, Yuta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - MR-only simulations provide pseudo-CT images which are segmented into 5 kinds of tissues from DIXON-based images. However, it is difficult to register pseudo-CT images to cone-beam CT (CBCT) images collected for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), because of the lack of contrasts among tissues. We validated gaps of IGRT between pseudo-CT or planning CT and CBCT for patients without implanted markers. We also propose calcification-assisted registration for MR-only simulation. We conducted retrospective analyses to verify the registration accuracy in 15 patients who underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. They underwent planning CT and pseudo-CT. Pseudo-CT images after deformable image registration (DIR) to planning CT images were rendered automatic pelvic bone matching to CBCT images. Patient positions on the pseudo-CT images after DIR were shifted on the basis of tissues around the prostate. We compared registration gaps between the images of planning CT and pseudo-CT with DIR, assuming that the tissue-based matching between the planning CT and CBCT was the gold standard. To the pseudo-CT images with DIR, calcifications detected on planning CT were added. We validated IGRT accuracy for a calcification-assisted registration. The absolute registration errors of the pseudo-CT, in comparison with the planning CT, were 0.34 ± 0.50 (lateral), 1.3 ± 1.3 (longitudinal), and 1.1 ± 1.0 mm (vertical). The absolute registration errors of the pseudo-CT with calcification contouring, in comparison with the planning CT, were 0.41 ± 1.0 (lateral), 0.87 ± 0.92 (longitudinal), and 0.74 ± 0.64 mm (vertical). Reduced absolute registration errors were observed in the proposed approach in the longitudinal (P < 0.01) and vertical (P < 0.01) dimensions when using calcification-assisted registration. The tissue-based registration using the MR-only simulation was not sufficient for use in patients with prostate cancer without implanted markers. The calcification-assisted registration might help to improve IGRT accuracy using MRI alone.
AB - MR-only simulations provide pseudo-CT images which are segmented into 5 kinds of tissues from DIXON-based images. However, it is difficult to register pseudo-CT images to cone-beam CT (CBCT) images collected for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), because of the lack of contrasts among tissues. We validated gaps of IGRT between pseudo-CT or planning CT and CBCT for patients without implanted markers. We also propose calcification-assisted registration for MR-only simulation. We conducted retrospective analyses to verify the registration accuracy in 15 patients who underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. They underwent planning CT and pseudo-CT. Pseudo-CT images after deformable image registration (DIR) to planning CT images were rendered automatic pelvic bone matching to CBCT images. Patient positions on the pseudo-CT images after DIR were shifted on the basis of tissues around the prostate. We compared registration gaps between the images of planning CT and pseudo-CT with DIR, assuming that the tissue-based matching between the planning CT and CBCT was the gold standard. To the pseudo-CT images with DIR, calcifications detected on planning CT were added. We validated IGRT accuracy for a calcification-assisted registration. The absolute registration errors of the pseudo-CT, in comparison with the planning CT, were 0.34 ± 0.50 (lateral), 1.3 ± 1.3 (longitudinal), and 1.1 ± 1.0 mm (vertical). The absolute registration errors of the pseudo-CT with calcification contouring, in comparison with the planning CT, were 0.41 ± 1.0 (lateral), 0.87 ± 0.92 (longitudinal), and 0.74 ± 0.64 mm (vertical). Reduced absolute registration errors were observed in the proposed approach in the longitudinal (P < 0.01) and vertical (P < 0.01) dimensions when using calcification-assisted registration. The tissue-based registration using the MR-only simulation was not sufficient for use in patients with prostate cancer without implanted markers. The calcification-assisted registration might help to improve IGRT accuracy using MRI alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062630073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062630073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/ab02cc
DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/ab02cc
M3 - Article
C2 - 30695772
AN - SCOPUS:85062630073
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 64
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 6
M1 - 06NT01
ER -