TY - JOUR
T1 - Hepatic CT perfusion measurements
T2 - A feasibility study for radiation dose reduction using new image reconstruction method
AU - Negi, Noriyuki
AU - Yoshikawa, Takeshi
AU - Ohno, Yoshiharu
AU - Somiya, Yuichiro
AU - Sekitani, Toshinori
AU - Sugihara, Naoki
AU - Koyama, Hisanobu
AU - Kanda, Tomonori
AU - Kanata, Naoki
AU - Murakami, Tohru
AU - Kawamitsu, Hideaki
AU - Sugimura, Kazuro
N1 - Funding Information:
Yoshiharu Ohno and Kazuro Sugimura: Toshiba Corporation research grant and Bayer Yakuhin research grant.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and Toshiba Medical Systems and Bayer Pharma.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Objectives: To assess the effects of image reconstruction method on hepatic CT perfusion (CTP) values using two CT protocols with different radiation doses. Materials and methods: Sixty patients underwent hepatic CTP and were randomly divided into two groups. Tube currents of 210 or 250 mA were used for the standard dose group and 120 or 140 mA for the low dose group. The higher currents were selected for large patients. Demographic features of the groups were compared. CT images were reconstructed by using filtered back projection (FBP), image filter (quantum de-noising, QDS), and adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR). Hepatic arterial and portal perfusion (HAP and HPP, ml/min/100 ml) and arterial perfusion fraction (APF, %) were calculated using the dual-input maximum slope method. ROIs were placed on each hepatic segment. Perfusion and Hounsfield unit (HU) values, and image noises (standard deviations of HU value, SD) were measured and compared between the groups and among the methods. Results: There were no significant differences in the demographic features of the groups, nor were there any significant differences in mean perfusion and HU values for either the groups or the image reconstruction methods. Mean SDs of each of the image reconstruction methods were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the standard dose group than the low dose group, while mean SDs for AIDR were significantly lower than those for FBP for both groups (p = 0.0006 and 0.013). Radiation dose reductions were approximately 45%. Conclusions: Image reconstruction method did not affect hepatic perfusion values calculated by dual-input maximum slope method with or without radiation dose reductions. AIDR significantly reduced images noises.
AB - Objectives: To assess the effects of image reconstruction method on hepatic CT perfusion (CTP) values using two CT protocols with different radiation doses. Materials and methods: Sixty patients underwent hepatic CTP and were randomly divided into two groups. Tube currents of 210 or 250 mA were used for the standard dose group and 120 or 140 mA for the low dose group. The higher currents were selected for large patients. Demographic features of the groups were compared. CT images were reconstructed by using filtered back projection (FBP), image filter (quantum de-noising, QDS), and adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR). Hepatic arterial and portal perfusion (HAP and HPP, ml/min/100 ml) and arterial perfusion fraction (APF, %) were calculated using the dual-input maximum slope method. ROIs were placed on each hepatic segment. Perfusion and Hounsfield unit (HU) values, and image noises (standard deviations of HU value, SD) were measured and compared between the groups and among the methods. Results: There were no significant differences in the demographic features of the groups, nor were there any significant differences in mean perfusion and HU values for either the groups or the image reconstruction methods. Mean SDs of each of the image reconstruction methods were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for the standard dose group than the low dose group, while mean SDs for AIDR were significantly lower than those for FBP for both groups (p = 0.0006 and 0.013). Radiation dose reductions were approximately 45%. Conclusions: Image reconstruction method did not affect hepatic perfusion values calculated by dual-input maximum slope method with or without radiation dose reductions. AIDR significantly reduced images noises.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866987678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866987678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 22613507
AN - SCOPUS:84866987678
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 81
SP - 3048
EP - 3054
JO - European journal of radiology
JF - European journal of radiology
IS - 11
ER -