TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of angiographic residual stenosis on clinical outcomes after new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation
T2 - Insights from a pooled analysis of the RESET and NEXT trials
AU - RESET and NEXT Investigators
AU - Watanabe, Hiroki
AU - Morimoto, Takeshi
AU - Shiomi, Hiroki
AU - Natsuaki, Masahiro
AU - Kawai, Kazuya
AU - Kozuma, Ken
AU - Igarashi, Keiichi
AU - Kadota, Kazushige
AU - Tanabe, Kengo
AU - Morino, Yoshihiro
AU - Hibi, Kiyoshi
AU - Akasaka, Takashi
AU - Abe, Mitsuru
AU - Suwa, Satoru
AU - Muramatsu, Toshiya
AU - Kobayashi, Masakazu
AU - Dai, Kazuoki
AU - Nakao, Koichi
AU - Tarutani, Yasuhiro
AU - Fujii, Kenshi
AU - Kimura, Takeshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background—Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target-lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients receiving new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods and Results—RESET (Randomized evaluation of sirolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stent trial) and NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent trial) are prospective, multicenter, randomized “DES versus DES” trials; 3196 patients and 3235 patients were enrolled in the RESET and NEXT, respectively. Using the pooled individual patient-level data, the current study population consisted of 3679 patients who received single-lesion treatment using new-generation DES such as everolimus-eluting stent and biolimus-eluting stent. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the residual in-stent % diameter stenosis (%DS) after stent implantation by offline quantitative coronary angiography assessed in a core angiographic laboratory (optimal group: %DS <10%, intermediate group: %DS=10% to 20%, suboptimal group: %DS ≧20%). The cumulative 3-year incidence of TLR was significantly higher in the suboptimal group than in the intermediate and optimal groups (9.8% versus 5.8% versus 5.7%, log-rank P=0.004). Even after adjusting for the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, the excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.65, 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.41, P=0.009). The excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group was consistently seen across all the subgroups including heavy calcification. Conclusions—The residual angiographic in-stent %DS ≥20% was associated with increased risk for TLR in patients treated with the new-generation DES.
AB - Background—Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target-lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients receiving new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods and Results—RESET (Randomized evaluation of sirolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stent trial) and NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent trial) are prospective, multicenter, randomized “DES versus DES” trials; 3196 patients and 3235 patients were enrolled in the RESET and NEXT, respectively. Using the pooled individual patient-level data, the current study population consisted of 3679 patients who received single-lesion treatment using new-generation DES such as everolimus-eluting stent and biolimus-eluting stent. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the residual in-stent % diameter stenosis (%DS) after stent implantation by offline quantitative coronary angiography assessed in a core angiographic laboratory (optimal group: %DS <10%, intermediate group: %DS=10% to 20%, suboptimal group: %DS ≧20%). The cumulative 3-year incidence of TLR was significantly higher in the suboptimal group than in the intermediate and optimal groups (9.8% versus 5.8% versus 5.7%, log-rank P=0.004). Even after adjusting for the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, the excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.65, 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.41, P=0.009). The excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group was consistently seen across all the subgroups including heavy calcification. Conclusions—The residual angiographic in-stent %DS ≥20% was associated with increased risk for TLR in patients treated with the new-generation DES.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049692420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049692420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.118.008718
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.118.008718
M3 - Article
C2 - 29960987
AN - SCOPUS:85049692420
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 7
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 13
M1 - e008718
ER -