TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the 2011 great east Japan earthquake and tsunami on functional disability among older people
T2 - A longitudinal comparison of disability prevalence among Japanese municipalities
AU - Tomata, Yasutake
AU - Kakizaki, Masako
AU - Suzuki, Yoshinori
AU - Hashimoto, Shuji
AU - Kawado, Miyuki
AU - Tsuji, Ichiro
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that disability prevalence has increased to a greater degree in the areas severely affected by the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011 than in other areas. Methods: Longitudinal analysis using public statistics data from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. The analysis included 1549 municipalities covered by the Long-term Care Insurance (LTCI) system. 'Disaster areas' were defined as three prefectures (Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima). The outcome measure was the number of aged people (≥65 years) with LTCI disability certification. Rates of change in disability prevalence from February 2011 to February 2012 were used as the primary outcome variable, and were compared by analysis of covariance between 'Coastal disaster areas', 'Inland disaster areas' and 'Non-disaster areas'. Results: Regarding disability prevalence at all levels, the mean value of the increase rate in Coastal disaster areas (7.1%) was higher than in Inland disaster areas (3.7%) and Non-disaster areas (2.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusions: The areas that were severely affected by the earthquake and tsunami had a significantly higher increase in disability prevalence during the 1 year after the earthquake disaster than other areas.
AB - Objective: To examine the hypothesis that disability prevalence has increased to a greater degree in the areas severely affected by the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011 than in other areas. Methods: Longitudinal analysis using public statistics data from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan. The analysis included 1549 municipalities covered by the Long-term Care Insurance (LTCI) system. 'Disaster areas' were defined as three prefectures (Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima). The outcome measure was the number of aged people (≥65 years) with LTCI disability certification. Rates of change in disability prevalence from February 2011 to February 2012 were used as the primary outcome variable, and were compared by analysis of covariance between 'Coastal disaster areas', 'Inland disaster areas' and 'Non-disaster areas'. Results: Regarding disability prevalence at all levels, the mean value of the increase rate in Coastal disaster areas (7.1%) was higher than in Inland disaster areas (3.7%) and Non-disaster areas (2.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusions: The areas that were severely affected by the earthquake and tsunami had a significantly higher increase in disability prevalence during the 1 year after the earthquake disaster than other areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901951975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901951975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech-2013-203541
DO - 10.1136/jech-2013-203541
M3 - Article
C2 - 24570399
AN - SCOPUS:84901951975
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 68
SP - 530
EP - 533
JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
IS - 6
ER -