In vitro activity of cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in Japan

Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) pose a major clinical threat. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and other recently approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against major CRGNB. Materials and methods: A total of 292 CRGNB clinical isolates were analyzed, comprising 146 Enterobacterales, 106 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 40 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, all collected from hospitals across Japan. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution (BMD). Disk diffusion testing was also conducted for cefiderocol, and categorical agreement with BMD was assessed. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used for species confirmation and characterization of resistance determinants. Results: Carbapenemase producers accounted for 64.4 % of Enterobacterales (94/146) and 8.5 % of P. aeruginosa (9/106), with metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers comprising 92.6 % (87/94) and 77.8 % (7/9), respectively. Based on CLSI breakpoints, 94.5 % (276/292) of isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, including 91.8 % of Enterobacterales, 99.1 % of P. aeruginosa, and 92.5 % of S. maltophilia. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and imipenem-relebactam were active against 12.3 %, 44.5 % and 45.9 % of Enterobacterales, and 89.6 %, 86.8 % and 72.6 % of P. aeruginosa, respectively. Categorical agreement between cefiderocol disk diffusion and BMD exceeded 92 % across all groups, although very major errors occurred in Enterobacterales (n = 2) and S. maltophilia (n = 3). Cefiderocol-non-susceptible Enterobacterales isolates frequently harbored carbapenemase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes, together with mutations in ftsI (encoding PBP3), ompK35, or siderophore receptor genes (cirA, tonB). Discussion: Cefiderocol showed potent in vitro activity against CRGNB in Japan, including MBL producers. Disk diffusion correlated well with BMD results; however, confirmatory BMD testing should be considered when resistance is clinically suspected.