TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporation of a computer-aided vessel-suppression system to detect lung nodules in CT images
T2 - effect on sensitivity and reading time in routine clinical settings
AU - Takaishi, Taku
AU - Ozawa, Yoshiyuki
AU - Bando, Yuya
AU - Yamamoto, Akiko
AU - Okochi, Sachiko
AU - Suzuki, Hirochika
AU - Shibamoto, Yuta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Japan Radiological Society.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate whether a computer-aided vessel-suppression system improves lung nodule detection in routine clinical settings. Materials and methods: We used computer software that automatically suppresses pulmonary vessels on chest CT while preserving pulmonary nodules. Sixty-one chest CT images were included in our study. Three radiologists independently read either standard CT images alone or both computer-aided CT and standard CT images randomly to detect a pulmonary nodule ≥ 4 mm in diameter. After an interval of at least 15 days to avoid recall bias, the three radiologists interpreted the counterpart images of the same patients. The reference standard was decided by an expert panel. The primary endpoint was sensitivity. The secondary endpoint was interpretation time. Results: The average sensitivity improved with computer-aided CT (72% for standard CT vs. 84% for computer-aided CT, p = 0.02). There was no difference in the false-positive rate (21% for both standard CT and computer-aided CT, p = 0.98). Although the average reading time was 9.5% longer for computer-aided plus standard CT compared with standard CT alone, the difference was not significant (p = 0.11). Conclusion: Vessel-suppressed CT images helped radiologists to improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection without compromising the false-positive rate.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate whether a computer-aided vessel-suppression system improves lung nodule detection in routine clinical settings. Materials and methods: We used computer software that automatically suppresses pulmonary vessels on chest CT while preserving pulmonary nodules. Sixty-one chest CT images were included in our study. Three radiologists independently read either standard CT images alone or both computer-aided CT and standard CT images randomly to detect a pulmonary nodule ≥ 4 mm in diameter. After an interval of at least 15 days to avoid recall bias, the three radiologists interpreted the counterpart images of the same patients. The reference standard was decided by an expert panel. The primary endpoint was sensitivity. The secondary endpoint was interpretation time. Results: The average sensitivity improved with computer-aided CT (72% for standard CT vs. 84% for computer-aided CT, p = 0.02). There was no difference in the false-positive rate (21% for both standard CT and computer-aided CT, p = 0.98). Although the average reading time was 9.5% longer for computer-aided plus standard CT compared with standard CT alone, the difference was not significant (p = 0.11). Conclusion: Vessel-suppressed CT images helped radiologists to improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection without compromising the false-positive rate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091034929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091034929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11604-020-01043-y
DO - 10.1007/s11604-020-01043-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 32940850
AN - SCOPUS:85091034929
SN - 1867-1071
VL - 39
SP - 159
EP - 164
JO - Japanese journal of radiology
JF - Japanese journal of radiology
IS - 2
ER -