TY - JOUR
T1 - Indigo naturalis is effective even in treatment-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis
T2 - a post hoc analysis from the INDIGO study
AU - For the INDIGO Study Group
AU - Naganuma, Makoto
AU - Sugimoto, Shinya
AU - Fukuda, Tomohiro
AU - Mitsuyama, Keiichi
AU - Kobayashi, Taku
AU - Yoshimura, Naoki
AU - Ohi, Hidehisa
AU - Tanaka, Shinji
AU - Andoh, Akira
AU - Ohmiya, Naoki
AU - Saigusa, Keiichiro
AU - Yamamoto, Takayuki
AU - Morohoshi, Yuichi
AU - Ichikawa, Hitoshi
AU - Matsuoka, Katsuyoshi
AU - Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
AU - Watanabe, Kenji
AU - Mizuno, Shinta
AU - Abe, Takayuki
AU - Suzuki, Yasuo
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Naganuma, Makoto
AU - Nakazato, Yoshihiro
AU - Teratani, Toshiaki
AU - Ogata, Haruhiko
AU - Iwao, Yasushi
AU - Yamasaki, Hiroshi
AU - Toyonaga, Takahiko
AU - Nakano, Masaru
AU - Hibi, Toshifumi
AU - Sameshima, Yoichi
AU - Hayashi, Ryohei
AU - Ueno, Yoshitaka
AU - Bamba, Shigeki
AU - Watanabe, Mamoru
AU - Nakazawa, Atsushi
AU - Koike, Yuji
AU - Imai, Jin
AU - Shimoyama, Takahiro
AU - Takeuchi, Ken
AU - Nagasaka, Mitsuo
AU - Kitano, Atsuo
AU - Ashizuka, Shinya
AU - Inatsu, Haruhiko
AU - Onodera, Kei
AU - Nakase, Hiroshi
AU - Kitamura, Kazuya
AU - Ikeya, Kentaro
AU - Hanai, Hiroyuki
AU - Watanabe, Chikako
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Background: We recently reported the efficacy of indigo naturalis (IN) in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a randomized controlled trial (INDIGO study). However, few studies have been conducted to investigate whether IN is effective even in treatment-refractory cases, such as in those with steroid dependency and anti-TNF refractoriness. Methods: In the INDIGO study, 86 patients with active UC were randomly assigned to an IN group (0.5–2.0 g daily) or placebo group. The rate of clinical response (CR), mucosal healing (MH), and change in fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels was compared between refractory [patients with steroid-dependent disease, previous use of anti-TNF-α, and concomitant use of immunomodulators (IM)] and non-refractory patients. We also analyzed factors predicting CR and MH at week 8. Results: The rates of CR of IN group were significantly higher than placebo group, even in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p < 0.001), previous use of anti-TNF-α (p = 0.002), and concomitant use of IM (p = 0.013). The rates of MH in IN group were significantly higher than in placebo group in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p = 0.009). In the IN group, median FCP levels, at week 8, were significantly lower than baseline in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α (p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that the previous use of anti-TNF-α was not a predictive factor for CR and MH at week 8. Conclusions: In a sub-analysis of data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that IN may be useful even in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α.
AB - Background: We recently reported the efficacy of indigo naturalis (IN) in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) in a randomized controlled trial (INDIGO study). However, few studies have been conducted to investigate whether IN is effective even in treatment-refractory cases, such as in those with steroid dependency and anti-TNF refractoriness. Methods: In the INDIGO study, 86 patients with active UC were randomly assigned to an IN group (0.5–2.0 g daily) or placebo group. The rate of clinical response (CR), mucosal healing (MH), and change in fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels was compared between refractory [patients with steroid-dependent disease, previous use of anti-TNF-α, and concomitant use of immunomodulators (IM)] and non-refractory patients. We also analyzed factors predicting CR and MH at week 8. Results: The rates of CR of IN group were significantly higher than placebo group, even in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p < 0.001), previous use of anti-TNF-α (p = 0.002), and concomitant use of IM (p = 0.013). The rates of MH in IN group were significantly higher than in placebo group in patients with steroid-dependent disease (p = 0.009). In the IN group, median FCP levels, at week 8, were significantly lower than baseline in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α (p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that the previous use of anti-TNF-α was not a predictive factor for CR and MH at week 8. Conclusions: In a sub-analysis of data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that IN may be useful even in patients with steroid-dependent disease and patients with the previous use of anti-TNF-α.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073819029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073819029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00535-019-01625-2
DO - 10.1007/s00535-019-01625-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 31529220
AN - SCOPUS:85073819029
SN - 0944-1174
VL - 55
SP - 169
EP - 180
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 2
ER -