TY - JOUR
T1 - Intra- and inter-rater reliability and validity of the tandem gait test for the assessment of dynamic gait balance
AU - Koyama, Soichiro
AU - Tanabe, Shigeo
AU - Itoh, Norihide
AU - Saitoh, Eiichi
AU - Takeda, Kazuya
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
AU - Ohtsuka, Kei
AU - Mukaino, Masahiko
AU - Yanohara, Ryuzo
AU - Sakurai, Hiroaki
AU - Kanada, Yoshikiyo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/7/3
Y1 - 2018/7/3
N2 - Purpose: To establish the within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, validity and systematic errors of the tandem gait test (TGT). Materials and methods: Thirty participants performed the TGT and the timed up and go test (TUG) twice on the first day. Three independent raters measured these tests. After two weeks, the protocol was repeated by one tester to assess between-day reliability. The within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots to assess systematic errors associated with the learning effect. Inter-rater reliability was estimated by ICC and minimum detectable change at 95% confidence. Concurrent validity was assessed by examination of the correlation between TGT and TUG using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: Within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability were good (ICC > 0.9 and ICC > 0.7). The Bland–Altman plots showed systematic error in the between-day measurements. Inter-rater reliability was supported by strong values for ICC (ICC > 0.9). The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the TGT and TUG showed a significant positive correlation (r > 0.67, p <.001). Conclusions: These results show that the learning effect of the TGT might be a considerable factor when interpreting follow-up measurements after a few days.
AB - Purpose: To establish the within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, validity and systematic errors of the tandem gait test (TGT). Materials and methods: Thirty participants performed the TGT and the timed up and go test (TUG) twice on the first day. Three independent raters measured these tests. After two weeks, the protocol was repeated by one tester to assess between-day reliability. The within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots to assess systematic errors associated with the learning effect. Inter-rater reliability was estimated by ICC and minimum detectable change at 95% confidence. Concurrent validity was assessed by examination of the correlation between TGT and TUG using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results: Within-day and between-day intra-rater reliability were good (ICC > 0.9 and ICC > 0.7). The Bland–Altman plots showed systematic error in the between-day measurements. Inter-rater reliability was supported by strong values for ICC (ICC > 0.9). The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the TGT and TUG showed a significant positive correlation (r > 0.67, p <.001). Conclusions: These results show that the learning effect of the TGT might be a considerable factor when interpreting follow-up measurements after a few days.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037999881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037999881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21679169.2017.1414304
DO - 10.1080/21679169.2017.1414304
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037999881
SN - 2167-9169
VL - 20
SP - 135
EP - 140
JO - European Journal of Physiotherapy
JF - European Journal of Physiotherapy
IS - 3
ER -