TY - JOUR
T1 - Japanese clinical guidelines for endoscopic treatment of pancreatolithiasis
AU - Inui, Kazuo
AU - Igarashi, Yoshinori
AU - Irisawa, Atsushi
AU - Ohara, Hirotaka
AU - Tazuma, Susumu
AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki
AU - Fujita, Naotaka
AU - Miyakawa, Hiroyuki
AU - Sata, Naohiro
AU - Shimosegawa, Tooru
AU - Tanaka, Masao
AU - Shiratori, Keiko
AU - Sugiyama, Masanori
AU - Takeyama, Yoshifumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Objectives: In addition to surgery, procedures for patients with pancreatolithiasis are developing; therefore, establishing practical guidelines for the management of pancreatolithiasis is required. Methods: Three committees (the professional committee for asking clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese endoscopists, the expert panel committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators) were organized. Eight endoscopists and a surgeon for pancreatolithiasis made the CQs and statements from a total of 694 reports of published literature by PubMed search (from 1983 to 2012). The expert panelists individually rated these clinical statements using amodified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving amedian score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee made 3, 7, and 10 CQs and statements for the concept and pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded them as valid after a 2-round modified Delphi approach. Conclusions: After evaluation by the moderators, the Japanese clinical guidelines for pancreatolithiasis were established. Further discussions and studies for international guidelines are needed.
AB - Objectives: In addition to surgery, procedures for patients with pancreatolithiasis are developing; therefore, establishing practical guidelines for the management of pancreatolithiasis is required. Methods: Three committees (the professional committee for asking clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese endoscopists, the expert panel committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators) were organized. Eight endoscopists and a surgeon for pancreatolithiasis made the CQs and statements from a total of 694 reports of published literature by PubMed search (from 1983 to 2012). The expert panelists individually rated these clinical statements using amodified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving amedian score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee made 3, 7, and 10 CQs and statements for the concept and pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded them as valid after a 2-round modified Delphi approach. Conclusions: After evaluation by the moderators, the Japanese clinical guidelines for pancreatolithiasis were established. Further discussions and studies for international guidelines are needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942029752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942029752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000449
DO - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000449
M3 - Article
C2 - 26355548
AN - SCOPUS:84942029752
SN - 0885-3177
VL - 44
SP - 1053
EP - 1064
JO - Pancreas
JF - Pancreas
IS - 7
ER -