Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy: Clinical article

Morio Matsumoto, Kota Watanabe, Takashi Tsuji, Ken Ishii, Masaya Nakamura, Kazuhiro Chiba, Yoshiaki Toyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors. Methods. Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 46.5 years) with malignant spinal tumors who underwent TES and survived for more than 1 year were included in this analysis (mean follow-up 41.5 months). Seven patients had primary tumors, including giant cell tumors in 4 patients, chordoma in 2, and Ewing sarcoma in 1. Eight patients had metastatic tumors, including thyroid cancer in 6 and renal cell cancer and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 patient each. Seven patients without prominent paravertebral extension of the tumor were treated using a posterior approach alone, and 8 patients who exhibited prominent anterior or anterolateral extension of the tumors into the thoracic or abdominal cavity were treated using a combined anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction after tumor resection was performed using a combination of anterior structural support and posterior instrumentation. The relationship between instrumentation failure and clinical and radiographic factors, including age, sex, history of previous surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor histology, tumor level, surgical approach, number of resected vertebrae, rod diameter, number of instrumented vertebrae, and cage subsidence, was investigated. Results. Six patients (40%) with spinal instrumentation failure were identified: rod breakage occurred in 3 patients, and breakage of both the rod and the cage, combined cage breakage and screw back-out, and endplate fracture arising from cage subsidence occurred in 1 patient each. All of these patients experienced acute or chronic back pain, but only 1 patient with a tumor recurrence experienced neurological deterioration upon instrumentation failure. Cage subsidence (≥ 5 mm), preoperative irradiation, and the number of instrumented vertebrae (≤ 4 vertebrae) were significantly related to late instrumentation failure. Conclusions. Late instrumentation failure was a frequent complication after TES. Although patients with instrumentation failure experienced back pain, the neurological sequelae were not catastrophic. For prevention, meticulous preparation of the graft site and a longer posterior fixation should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-327
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-09-2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Spine
Back Pain
Thoracic Cavity
Chordoma
Giant Cell Tumors
Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma
Ewing's Sarcoma
Abdominal Cavity
Age Factors
Thyroid Neoplasms
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Chronic Pain
Histology
Radiotherapy
Transplants
Recurrence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Matsumoto, Morio ; Watanabe, Kota ; Tsuji, Takashi ; Ishii, Ken ; Nakamura, Masaya ; Chiba, Kazuhiro ; Toyama, Yoshiaki. / Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy : Clinical article. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2011 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 320-327.
@article{ccc3928c7d5740d1845737c81c392f1a,
title = "Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy: Clinical article",
abstract = "Object. The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors. Methods. Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 46.5 years) with malignant spinal tumors who underwent TES and survived for more than 1 year were included in this analysis (mean follow-up 41.5 months). Seven patients had primary tumors, including giant cell tumors in 4 patients, chordoma in 2, and Ewing sarcoma in 1. Eight patients had metastatic tumors, including thyroid cancer in 6 and renal cell cancer and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 patient each. Seven patients without prominent paravertebral extension of the tumor were treated using a posterior approach alone, and 8 patients who exhibited prominent anterior or anterolateral extension of the tumors into the thoracic or abdominal cavity were treated using a combined anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction after tumor resection was performed using a combination of anterior structural support and posterior instrumentation. The relationship between instrumentation failure and clinical and radiographic factors, including age, sex, history of previous surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor histology, tumor level, surgical approach, number of resected vertebrae, rod diameter, number of instrumented vertebrae, and cage subsidence, was investigated. Results. Six patients (40{\%}) with spinal instrumentation failure were identified: rod breakage occurred in 3 patients, and breakage of both the rod and the cage, combined cage breakage and screw back-out, and endplate fracture arising from cage subsidence occurred in 1 patient each. All of these patients experienced acute or chronic back pain, but only 1 patient with a tumor recurrence experienced neurological deterioration upon instrumentation failure. Cage subsidence (≥ 5 mm), preoperative irradiation, and the number of instrumented vertebrae (≤ 4 vertebrae) were significantly related to late instrumentation failure. Conclusions. Late instrumentation failure was a frequent complication after TES. Although patients with instrumentation failure experienced back pain, the neurological sequelae were not catastrophic. For prevention, meticulous preparation of the graft site and a longer posterior fixation should be considered.",
author = "Morio Matsumoto and Kota Watanabe and Takashi Tsuji and Ken Ishii and Masaya Nakamura and Kazuhiro Chiba and Yoshiaki Toyama",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10813",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "320--327",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

Matsumoto, M, Watanabe, K, Tsuji, T, Ishii, K, Nakamura, M, Chiba, K & Toyama, Y 2011, 'Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy: Clinical article', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 320-327. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10813

Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy : Clinical article. / Matsumoto, Morio; Watanabe, Kota; Tsuji, Takashi; Ishii, Ken; Nakamura, Masaya; Chiba, Kazuhiro; Toyama, Yoshiaki.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 320-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy

T2 - Clinical article

AU - Matsumoto, Morio

AU - Watanabe, Kota

AU - Tsuji, Takashi

AU - Ishii, Ken

AU - Nakamura, Masaya

AU - Chiba, Kazuhiro

AU - Toyama, Yoshiaki

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Object. The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors. Methods. Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 46.5 years) with malignant spinal tumors who underwent TES and survived for more than 1 year were included in this analysis (mean follow-up 41.5 months). Seven patients had primary tumors, including giant cell tumors in 4 patients, chordoma in 2, and Ewing sarcoma in 1. Eight patients had metastatic tumors, including thyroid cancer in 6 and renal cell cancer and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 patient each. Seven patients without prominent paravertebral extension of the tumor were treated using a posterior approach alone, and 8 patients who exhibited prominent anterior or anterolateral extension of the tumors into the thoracic or abdominal cavity were treated using a combined anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction after tumor resection was performed using a combination of anterior structural support and posterior instrumentation. The relationship between instrumentation failure and clinical and radiographic factors, including age, sex, history of previous surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor histology, tumor level, surgical approach, number of resected vertebrae, rod diameter, number of instrumented vertebrae, and cage subsidence, was investigated. Results. Six patients (40%) with spinal instrumentation failure were identified: rod breakage occurred in 3 patients, and breakage of both the rod and the cage, combined cage breakage and screw back-out, and endplate fracture arising from cage subsidence occurred in 1 patient each. All of these patients experienced acute or chronic back pain, but only 1 patient with a tumor recurrence experienced neurological deterioration upon instrumentation failure. Cage subsidence (≥ 5 mm), preoperative irradiation, and the number of instrumented vertebrae (≤ 4 vertebrae) were significantly related to late instrumentation failure. Conclusions. Late instrumentation failure was a frequent complication after TES. Although patients with instrumentation failure experienced back pain, the neurological sequelae were not catastrophic. For prevention, meticulous preparation of the graft site and a longer posterior fixation should be considered.

AB - Object. The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors. Methods. Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 46.5 years) with malignant spinal tumors who underwent TES and survived for more than 1 year were included in this analysis (mean follow-up 41.5 months). Seven patients had primary tumors, including giant cell tumors in 4 patients, chordoma in 2, and Ewing sarcoma in 1. Eight patients had metastatic tumors, including thyroid cancer in 6 and renal cell cancer and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 patient each. Seven patients without prominent paravertebral extension of the tumor were treated using a posterior approach alone, and 8 patients who exhibited prominent anterior or anterolateral extension of the tumors into the thoracic or abdominal cavity were treated using a combined anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction after tumor resection was performed using a combination of anterior structural support and posterior instrumentation. The relationship between instrumentation failure and clinical and radiographic factors, including age, sex, history of previous surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor histology, tumor level, surgical approach, number of resected vertebrae, rod diameter, number of instrumented vertebrae, and cage subsidence, was investigated. Results. Six patients (40%) with spinal instrumentation failure were identified: rod breakage occurred in 3 patients, and breakage of both the rod and the cage, combined cage breakage and screw back-out, and endplate fracture arising from cage subsidence occurred in 1 patient each. All of these patients experienced acute or chronic back pain, but only 1 patient with a tumor recurrence experienced neurological deterioration upon instrumentation failure. Cage subsidence (≥ 5 mm), preoperative irradiation, and the number of instrumented vertebrae (≤ 4 vertebrae) were significantly related to late instrumentation failure. Conclusions. Late instrumentation failure was a frequent complication after TES. Although patients with instrumentation failure experienced back pain, the neurological sequelae were not catastrophic. For prevention, meticulous preparation of the graft site and a longer posterior fixation should be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052595702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052595702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10813

DO - 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10813

M3 - Article

C2 - 21639702

AN - SCOPUS:80052595702

VL - 15

SP - 320

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 3

ER -