TY - JOUR
T1 - Living-donor liver transplantation using donors older than 50 years of age
T2 - Recipient criteria and donor risk: A multicenter study of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
AU - Toshima, Takeo
AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
AU - Takada, Yasutsugu
AU - Ito, Takashi
AU - Shinoda, Masahiro
AU - Takahara, Takeshi
AU - Ishido, Keinosuke
AU - Takamura, Hiroyuki
AU - Taketomi, Akinobu
AU - Chiba, Naokazu
AU - Nakamura, Masafumi
AU - Shirabe, Ken
AU - Endo, Itaru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Background: Few published reports have addressed the feasibility of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using elderly donors. We aimed to examine LDLT outcomes in elderly donors and identify clinical factors impacting safely conducted LDLT. Methods: This study was conducted in collaboration with the Japanese Society of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Data were collected from 140 patients who underwent LDLT using donors aged ≥50 years between 2013 and 2017 at nine collaborating hospitals. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates in recipients after LDLT employing elderly donors were 84.3%, 78.5%, and 76.3%, respectively, with 6-month mortality of 12.1%. Specific recipient-donor age combinations did not emerge as adverse prognostic factors. A total of 32 recipients (22.9%) had major complications requiring reoperation after LDLT, and 15 donors (10.7%) had major complications of Clavien–Dindo grade ≥II. Multivariate analysis revealed that graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.84% and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >6.6 were independent predictors of 6-month graft loss after LDLT. Conclusion: LDLT using elderly donors aged ≥50 years has acceptable graft survival and morbidity rates, and donor age >50 years should not be an absolute contraindication for LDLT. In LDLT involving elderly donors, it is crucial to consider that GRWR <0.84% and NLR >6.6 are adverse prognostic factors. Addressing these factors is necessary to enhance the prognosis, aligning with the increasing public demand for this surgical procedure.
AB - Background: Few published reports have addressed the feasibility of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using elderly donors. We aimed to examine LDLT outcomes in elderly donors and identify clinical factors impacting safely conducted LDLT. Methods: This study was conducted in collaboration with the Japanese Society of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Data were collected from 140 patients who underwent LDLT using donors aged ≥50 years between 2013 and 2017 at nine collaborating hospitals. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates in recipients after LDLT employing elderly donors were 84.3%, 78.5%, and 76.3%, respectively, with 6-month mortality of 12.1%. Specific recipient-donor age combinations did not emerge as adverse prognostic factors. A total of 32 recipients (22.9%) had major complications requiring reoperation after LDLT, and 15 donors (10.7%) had major complications of Clavien–Dindo grade ≥II. Multivariate analysis revealed that graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.84% and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >6.6 were independent predictors of 6-month graft loss after LDLT. Conclusion: LDLT using elderly donors aged ≥50 years has acceptable graft survival and morbidity rates, and donor age >50 years should not be an absolute contraindication for LDLT. In LDLT involving elderly donors, it is crucial to consider that GRWR <0.84% and NLR >6.6 are adverse prognostic factors. Addressing these factors is necessary to enhance the prognosis, aligning with the increasing public demand for this surgical procedure.
KW - donor age
KW - elderly donor
KW - liver regeneration
KW - living-donor liver transplantation
KW - small-for-size graft syndrome
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219673527
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219673527#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/jhbp.12118
DO - 10.1002/jhbp.12118
M3 - Article
C2 - 39963853
AN - SCOPUS:85219673527
SN - 1868-6974
VL - 32
SP - 287
EP - 297
JO - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
JF - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
IS - 4
ER -