TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term durability of pericardial valves in the aortic position in younger patients
T2 - When does reoperation become necessary?
AU - Minakata, Kenji
AU - Tanaka, Shiro
AU - Takahara, Yoshiharu
AU - Kaneko, Tatsuo
AU - Usui, Akihiko
AU - Shimamoto, Mitsuomi
AU - Okawa, Yohei
AU - Yaku, Hitoshi
AU - Yamanaka, Kazuo
AU - Tamura, Nobushige
AU - Sakata, Ryuzo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Background We sought to assess the long-term durability of pericardial valves in patients at age <65 years undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), and to determine the timing of redo operations due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). Methods From 1986 to 2001, a total of 574 adult patients underwent AVR with pericardial valves in nine hospitals in Japan. Of these, 53 patients were at age <65 years (group Y). These patients were compared with those of age ≥65 (group O, n = 521). Results The mean follow-up duration was 9.5 years in group Y and 8.1 years in group O. Freedom from reoperation due to SVD was 100% at five years, 90.8% at 10 years, and 47.2% at 15 years in group Y, and 99.3% at five years, 97.4% at 10 years, and 94.4% at 15 years in group O (log-rank test, p < 0.01). In those who required redo AVR in group Y (n = 12), the mean time from initial operation to reoperation was 12.1 years. The reoperation-free survival curve started to decline after eight years postoperation in group Y. Conclusions Redo AVR started to become necessary eight years after surgery in the patients who underwent AVR with pericardial valve at age <65 years. In addition, approximately half of those patients required reoperation due to SVD by 15 years postoperatively.
AB - Background We sought to assess the long-term durability of pericardial valves in patients at age <65 years undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), and to determine the timing of redo operations due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). Methods From 1986 to 2001, a total of 574 adult patients underwent AVR with pericardial valves in nine hospitals in Japan. Of these, 53 patients were at age <65 years (group Y). These patients were compared with those of age ≥65 (group O, n = 521). Results The mean follow-up duration was 9.5 years in group Y and 8.1 years in group O. Freedom from reoperation due to SVD was 100% at five years, 90.8% at 10 years, and 47.2% at 15 years in group Y, and 99.3% at five years, 97.4% at 10 years, and 94.4% at 15 years in group O (log-rank test, p < 0.01). In those who required redo AVR in group Y (n = 12), the mean time from initial operation to reoperation was 12.1 years. The reoperation-free survival curve started to decline after eight years postoperation in group Y. Conclusions Redo AVR started to become necessary eight years after surgery in the patients who underwent AVR with pericardial valve at age <65 years. In addition, approximately half of those patients required reoperation due to SVD by 15 years postoperatively.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84928827462
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928827462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jocs.12537
DO - 10.1111/jocs.12537
M3 - Article
C2 - 25786674
AN - SCOPUS:84928827462
SN - 0886-0440
VL - 30
SP - 405
EP - 413
JO - Journal of Cardiac Surgery
JF - Journal of Cardiac Surgery
IS - 5
ER -