TY - JOUR
T1 - Long term prognosis of chronic heart failure - Reduced vs preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
AU - Miyagishima, Kenji
AU - Hiramitsu, Shinya
AU - Kimura, Hisashi
AU - Mori, Kazumasa
AU - Ueda, Tomoya
AU - Kato, Shigeru
AU - Kato, Yasuchika
AU - Ishikawa, Shiho
AU - Iwase, Masatsugu
AU - Morimoto, Shin Ichiro
AU - Hishida, Hitoshi
AU - Ozaki, Yukio
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background: Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction is attracting increasing attention of one of the etiologies of chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results: The study sample included 560 patients with CHF who were hospitalized during the 5-year period. They were classified into 2 groups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced group (LVEF<50%, n=431); or preserved group (LVEF≥50%, n=129). The degree of cardiac symptoms did not differ between the 2 groups; however, no difference was found between the 2 groups in the mortality rate (P=0.898), and readmission rates (P=0.674). The results of a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of the prognosis of heart failure revealed no difference in prognosis according to the presence/absence of decreased LVEF, whereas renal dysfunction and anemia were identified as significant prognostic determinants. Also, in the reduced group, the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), β-blockers reduced mortality. In the preserved group, ACE-I and/or ARB administration reduced mortality, whereas β-blockers did not. Conclusion In the present study, the likelihood of LVEF influencing prognosis was considered to be low, with the contribution of non-cardiac factors such as renal function and anemia concluded to be greater.
AB - Background: Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction is attracting increasing attention of one of the etiologies of chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and Results: The study sample included 560 patients with CHF who were hospitalized during the 5-year period. They were classified into 2 groups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced group (LVEF<50%, n=431); or preserved group (LVEF≥50%, n=129). The degree of cardiac symptoms did not differ between the 2 groups; however, no difference was found between the 2 groups in the mortality rate (P=0.898), and readmission rates (P=0.674). The results of a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of the prognosis of heart failure revealed no difference in prognosis according to the presence/absence of decreased LVEF, whereas renal dysfunction and anemia were identified as significant prognostic determinants. Also, in the reduced group, the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), β-blockers reduced mortality. In the preserved group, ACE-I and/or ARB administration reduced mortality, whereas β-blockers did not. Conclusion In the present study, the likelihood of LVEF influencing prognosis was considered to be low, with the contribution of non-cardiac factors such as renal function and anemia concluded to be greater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549097092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58549097092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-07-1016
DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-07-1016
M3 - Article
C2 - 19043227
AN - SCOPUS:58549097092
SN - 1346-9843
VL - 73
SP - 92
EP - 99
JO - Circulation Journal
JF - Circulation Journal
IS - 1
ER -