TY - JOUR
T1 - Lumbar spinal surgery improves locomotive syndrome in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis
T2 - A multicenter prospective study
AU - Fujita, Nobuyuki
AU - Michikawa, Takehiro
AU - Miyamoto, Azusa
AU - Sakurai, Aiko
AU - Otaka, Yohei
AU - Suzuki, Satoshi
AU - Tsuji, Osahiko
AU - Nagoshi, Narihito
AU - Okada, Eijiro
AU - Yagi, Mitsuru
AU - Tsuji, Takashi
AU - Kono, Hitoshi
AU - Ishii, Ken
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Watanabe, Kota
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Background: Owing to musculoskeletal dysfunction, locomotive syndrome elevates the risk of requiring nursing care. Among degenerative musculoskeletal disorders, lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) associates with locomotive syndrome; however, whether lumbar spinal surgery for LSS improves locomotive syndrome remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to identify the efficacy of lumbar spinal surgery on locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS. Methods: We prospectively collected the clinical data from multiple institutions of patients (age >65 years) who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. Patients were examined for the locomotive syndrome risk test, including the stand-up Test, the two-step Test, and the 25-question risk assessment, 1-day preoperatively and 6-month and 1-year postoperatively. Using a logistic regression model, we identified factors associated with improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment. Results: Overall, we examined the data of 166 patients in this study. Upon converting each score of three tests to the stage of locomotive syndrome, the two-step test and the 25-question risk assessment revealed marked improvement in the postoperative distribution of stages. However, the stand-up test revealed a comparable distribution of stages pre- and postoperatively. In the total assessment, the postoperative distribution of stages was significantly improved than that preoperatively. The multivariable analysis revealed that failed back surgery syndrome [odds ratio (OR), 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–1.05; P = 0.057)] and preoperative stage of 2 in stand-up test (OR, 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05–1.02; P = 0.054) tended to have inverse association with postoperative improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment. Conclusions: Lumbar spinal surgery improved the stage of locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS. This study suggests that lumbar spinal surgery for LSS could be beneficial in alleviating locomotive syndrome.
AB - Background: Owing to musculoskeletal dysfunction, locomotive syndrome elevates the risk of requiring nursing care. Among degenerative musculoskeletal disorders, lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) associates with locomotive syndrome; however, whether lumbar spinal surgery for LSS improves locomotive syndrome remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to identify the efficacy of lumbar spinal surgery on locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS. Methods: We prospectively collected the clinical data from multiple institutions of patients (age >65 years) who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. Patients were examined for the locomotive syndrome risk test, including the stand-up Test, the two-step Test, and the 25-question risk assessment, 1-day preoperatively and 6-month and 1-year postoperatively. Using a logistic regression model, we identified factors associated with improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment. Results: Overall, we examined the data of 166 patients in this study. Upon converting each score of three tests to the stage of locomotive syndrome, the two-step test and the 25-question risk assessment revealed marked improvement in the postoperative distribution of stages. However, the stand-up test revealed a comparable distribution of stages pre- and postoperatively. In the total assessment, the postoperative distribution of stages was significantly improved than that preoperatively. The multivariable analysis revealed that failed back surgery syndrome [odds ratio (OR), 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–1.05; P = 0.057)] and preoperative stage of 2 in stand-up test (OR, 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05–1.02; P = 0.054) tended to have inverse association with postoperative improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment. Conclusions: Lumbar spinal surgery improved the stage of locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS. This study suggests that lumbar spinal surgery for LSS could be beneficial in alleviating locomotive syndrome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064164467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064164467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30982707
AN - SCOPUS:85064164467
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 25
SP - 213
EP - 218
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 2
ER -