Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22)

Terry Ashley, Ann P. Gaeth, Hidehito Inagaki, Allen Seftel, Maimon M. Cohen, Lorinda K. Anderson, Hiroki Kurahashi, Beverly S. Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although balanced translocations are among the most common human chromosomal aberrations, the constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation. Evidence indicates that de novo formation of the t(11;22) occurs during meiosis. To test the hypothesis that spatial proximity of chromosomes 11 and 22 in meiotic prophase oocytes and spermatocytes plays a role in the rearrangement, the positions of the 11q23 and 22q11 translocation breakpoints were examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with use of DNA probes for these sites demonstrates that 11q23 is closer to 22q11 in meiosis than to a control at 6q26. Although chromosome 21p11, another control, often lies as close to 11q23 as does 22q11 during meiosis, chromosome 21 rarely rearranges with 11q23, and the DNA sequence of chromosome 21 appears to be less susceptible than 22q11 to double-strand breaks (DSBs). It has been suggested that the rearrangement recurs as a result of the palindromic AT-rich repeats at both 11q23 and 22q11, which extrude hairpin structures that are susceptible to DSBs. To determine whether the DSBs at these sites coincide with normal hotspots of meiotic recombination, immunocytochemical mapping of MLH1, a protein involved in crossing over, was employed. The results indicate that the translocation breakpoints do not coincide with recombination hotspots and therefore are unlikely to be the result of meiotic programmed DSBs, although MRE11 is likely to be involved. Previous analysis indicated that the DSBs appear to be repaired by a mechanism similar to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), although NHEJ is normally suppressed during meiosis. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that physical proximity between 11q23 and 22q11-but not typical meiotic recombinational activity in meiotic prophase-plays an important role in the generation of the constitutional t(11;22) rearrangement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)524-538
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2006

Fingerprint

Meiosis
Genetic Recombination
Prophase
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11
Spermatocytes
DNA Probes
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Chromosome Aberrations
Oocytes
Chromosomes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Ashley, T., Gaeth, A. P., Inagaki, H., Seftel, A., Cohen, M. M., Anderson, L. K., ... Emanuel, B. S. (2006). Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22). American Journal of Human Genetics, 79(3), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1086/507652
Ashley, Terry ; Gaeth, Ann P. ; Inagaki, Hidehito ; Seftel, Allen ; Cohen, Maimon M. ; Anderson, Lorinda K. ; Kurahashi, Hiroki ; Emanuel, Beverly S. / Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22). In: American Journal of Human Genetics. 2006 ; Vol. 79, No. 3. pp. 524-538.
@article{6f0ef509cebd450a83087b2b1a2d95d1,
title = "Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22)",
abstract = "Although balanced translocations are among the most common human chromosomal aberrations, the constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation. Evidence indicates that de novo formation of the t(11;22) occurs during meiosis. To test the hypothesis that spatial proximity of chromosomes 11 and 22 in meiotic prophase oocytes and spermatocytes plays a role in the rearrangement, the positions of the 11q23 and 22q11 translocation breakpoints were examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with use of DNA probes for these sites demonstrates that 11q23 is closer to 22q11 in meiosis than to a control at 6q26. Although chromosome 21p11, another control, often lies as close to 11q23 as does 22q11 during meiosis, chromosome 21 rarely rearranges with 11q23, and the DNA sequence of chromosome 21 appears to be less susceptible than 22q11 to double-strand breaks (DSBs). It has been suggested that the rearrangement recurs as a result of the palindromic AT-rich repeats at both 11q23 and 22q11, which extrude hairpin structures that are susceptible to DSBs. To determine whether the DSBs at these sites coincide with normal hotspots of meiotic recombination, immunocytochemical mapping of MLH1, a protein involved in crossing over, was employed. The results indicate that the translocation breakpoints do not coincide with recombination hotspots and therefore are unlikely to be the result of meiotic programmed DSBs, although MRE11 is likely to be involved. Previous analysis indicated that the DSBs appear to be repaired by a mechanism similar to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), although NHEJ is normally suppressed during meiosis. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that physical proximity between 11q23 and 22q11-but not typical meiotic recombinational activity in meiotic prophase-plays an important role in the generation of the constitutional t(11;22) rearrangement.",
author = "Terry Ashley and Gaeth, {Ann P.} and Hidehito Inagaki and Allen Seftel and Cohen, {Maimon M.} and Anderson, {Lorinda K.} and Hiroki Kurahashi and Emanuel, {Beverly S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/507652",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "524--538",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "3",

}

Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22). / Ashley, Terry; Gaeth, Ann P.; Inagaki, Hidehito; Seftel, Allen; Cohen, Maimon M.; Anderson, Lorinda K.; Kurahashi, Hiroki; Emanuel, Beverly S.

In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 79, No. 3, 01.01.2006, p. 524-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22)

AU - Ashley, Terry

AU - Gaeth, Ann P.

AU - Inagaki, Hidehito

AU - Seftel, Allen

AU - Cohen, Maimon M.

AU - Anderson, Lorinda K.

AU - Kurahashi, Hiroki

AU - Emanuel, Beverly S.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Although balanced translocations are among the most common human chromosomal aberrations, the constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation. Evidence indicates that de novo formation of the t(11;22) occurs during meiosis. To test the hypothesis that spatial proximity of chromosomes 11 and 22 in meiotic prophase oocytes and spermatocytes plays a role in the rearrangement, the positions of the 11q23 and 22q11 translocation breakpoints were examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with use of DNA probes for these sites demonstrates that 11q23 is closer to 22q11 in meiosis than to a control at 6q26. Although chromosome 21p11, another control, often lies as close to 11q23 as does 22q11 during meiosis, chromosome 21 rarely rearranges with 11q23, and the DNA sequence of chromosome 21 appears to be less susceptible than 22q11 to double-strand breaks (DSBs). It has been suggested that the rearrangement recurs as a result of the palindromic AT-rich repeats at both 11q23 and 22q11, which extrude hairpin structures that are susceptible to DSBs. To determine whether the DSBs at these sites coincide with normal hotspots of meiotic recombination, immunocytochemical mapping of MLH1, a protein involved in crossing over, was employed. The results indicate that the translocation breakpoints do not coincide with recombination hotspots and therefore are unlikely to be the result of meiotic programmed DSBs, although MRE11 is likely to be involved. Previous analysis indicated that the DSBs appear to be repaired by a mechanism similar to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), although NHEJ is normally suppressed during meiosis. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that physical proximity between 11q23 and 22q11-but not typical meiotic recombinational activity in meiotic prophase-plays an important role in the generation of the constitutional t(11;22) rearrangement.

AB - Although balanced translocations are among the most common human chromosomal aberrations, the constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) is the only known recurrent non-Robertsonian translocation. Evidence indicates that de novo formation of the t(11;22) occurs during meiosis. To test the hypothesis that spatial proximity of chromosomes 11 and 22 in meiotic prophase oocytes and spermatocytes plays a role in the rearrangement, the positions of the 11q23 and 22q11 translocation breakpoints were examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with use of DNA probes for these sites demonstrates that 11q23 is closer to 22q11 in meiosis than to a control at 6q26. Although chromosome 21p11, another control, often lies as close to 11q23 as does 22q11 during meiosis, chromosome 21 rarely rearranges with 11q23, and the DNA sequence of chromosome 21 appears to be less susceptible than 22q11 to double-strand breaks (DSBs). It has been suggested that the rearrangement recurs as a result of the palindromic AT-rich repeats at both 11q23 and 22q11, which extrude hairpin structures that are susceptible to DSBs. To determine whether the DSBs at these sites coincide with normal hotspots of meiotic recombination, immunocytochemical mapping of MLH1, a protein involved in crossing over, was employed. The results indicate that the translocation breakpoints do not coincide with recombination hotspots and therefore are unlikely to be the result of meiotic programmed DSBs, although MRE11 is likely to be involved. Previous analysis indicated that the DSBs appear to be repaired by a mechanism similar to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), although NHEJ is normally suppressed during meiosis. Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that physical proximity between 11q23 and 22q11-but not typical meiotic recombinational activity in meiotic prophase-plays an important role in the generation of the constitutional t(11;22) rearrangement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748657156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748657156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/507652

DO - 10.1086/507652

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 524

EP - 538

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 3

ER -