TY - JOUR
T1 - New classification system for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament using CT images
AU - Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Iwasaki, Motoki
AU - Izumi, Tomohiro
AU - Okawa, Atsushi
AU - Matsunaga, Shunji
AU - Chiba, Kazuhiro
AU - Tsuji, Takashi
AU - Yamazaki, Masashi
AU - Fujimori, Takahito
AU - Yoshii, Toshitaka
AU - Toyama, Yoshiaki
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was supported by Health Labour Sciences Research Grant, Research on intractable diseases, Committee for Study of Ossification of Spinal Ligament. The authors thank Mika Kigawa, assistant professor, Department of Public Health, Toyama University, for statistical assistance.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Background: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is most frequently seen in the cervical spine. The types of cervical OPLL are classified into continuous, mixed, segmental, and other based on plain lateral X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is often used in clinical practice for evaluating ossified lesions as it can detect their precise location, size, and shape. However, to date, no CT classification of OPLL lesions has been proposed. Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with cervical OPLL by plain radiograph were included in this study. Sagittal and axial CT images of the cervical spine were obtained. We propose three classification systems: A, B, and axial. Classification A comprises two lesion types: bridge and nonbridge. Classification B requires examiners to describe all vertebral and intervertebral levels where OPLL exits in the cervical spine. Axial classification comprises central and lateral lesions identified on axial CT images. Seven observers evaluated CT images using this classification system, and intra- and interrater reliability were examined. Results: Averaged Fleiss' kappa coefficient of interrater agreement was 0.43 ± 0.26 among the seven observers, averaged intrarater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 72.4 ± 8.8 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 67.5-76.8]. Fifty-four patients (37.5 %) had the bridge type and 90 the nonbridge type according to Classification A; 102 (70.8 %) had central and 42 (29.2 %) lateral OPLL in the axial classification. Four representative cases defined according to the three classification types are reported here. Conclusion: Subcommittee members of the Investigation Committee on the Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare propose three new classification systems of cervical OPLL based on CT imaging: A, B, and axial.
AB - Background: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is most frequently seen in the cervical spine. The types of cervical OPLL are classified into continuous, mixed, segmental, and other based on plain lateral X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is often used in clinical practice for evaluating ossified lesions as it can detect their precise location, size, and shape. However, to date, no CT classification of OPLL lesions has been proposed. Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with cervical OPLL by plain radiograph were included in this study. Sagittal and axial CT images of the cervical spine were obtained. We propose three classification systems: A, B, and axial. Classification A comprises two lesion types: bridge and nonbridge. Classification B requires examiners to describe all vertebral and intervertebral levels where OPLL exits in the cervical spine. Axial classification comprises central and lateral lesions identified on axial CT images. Seven observers evaluated CT images using this classification system, and intra- and interrater reliability were examined. Results: Averaged Fleiss' kappa coefficient of interrater agreement was 0.43 ± 0.26 among the seven observers, averaged intrarater reliability for the existence of OPLL was 72.4 ± 8.8 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 67.5-76.8]. Fifty-four patients (37.5 %) had the bridge type and 90 the nonbridge type according to Classification A; 102 (70.8 %) had central and 42 (29.2 %) lateral OPLL in the axial classification. Four representative cases defined according to the three classification types are reported here. Conclusion: Subcommittee members of the Investigation Committee on the Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare propose three new classification systems of cervical OPLL based on CT imaging: A, B, and axial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905095287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905095287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00776-014-0577-4
DO - 10.1007/s00776-014-0577-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 24817494
AN - SCOPUS:84905095287
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 19
SP - 530
EP - 536
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 4
ER -