TY - JOUR
T1 - Normal karyotype is a poor prognostic factor in myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome
T2 - A retrospective, international study
AU - Blink, Marjolein
AU - Zimmermann, Martin
AU - von Neuhoff, Christine
AU - Reinhardt, Dirk
AU - de Haas, Valerie
AU - Hasle, Henrik
AU - O'Brien, Maureen M.
AU - Stark, Batia
AU - Tandonnet, Julie
AU - Pession, Andrea
AU - Tousovska, Katerina
AU - Cheuk, Daniel K.L.
AU - Kudo, Kazuko
AU - Taga, Takashi
AU - Rubnitz, Jeffrey E.
AU - Haltrich, Iren
AU - Balwierz, Walentyna
AU - Pieters, Rob
AU - Forestier, Erik
AU - Johansson, Bertil
AU - van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M.
AU - Michel Zwaan, C.
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome has a better prognosis than sporadic pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Most cases of myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome are characterized by additional cytogenetic changes besides the constitutional trisomy 21, but their potential prognostic impact is not known. We, therefore, conducted an international retrospective study of clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, treatment, and outcome of 451 children with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome. All karyotypes were centrally reviewed before assigning patients to subgroups. The overall 7-year event-free survival for the entire cohort was 78% (±2%), with the overall survival rate being 79% (±2%), the cumulative incidence of relapse 12% (±2%), and the cumulative incidence of toxic death 7% (±1%). Outcome estimates showed large differences across the different cytogenetic subgroups. Based on the cumulative incidence of relapse, we could risk-stratify patients into two groups: cases with a normal karyotype (n=103) with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (21%±4%) than cases with an aberrant karyotype (n=255) with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 9% (±2%) (P=0.004). Multivariate analyses revealed that white blood cell count ≥20×109/L and age >3 years were independent predictors for poor event-free survival, while normal karyotype independently predicted inferior overall survival, event-free survival, and relapse-free survival. In conclusion, this study showed large differences in outcome within patients with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome and identified novel prognostic groups that predicted clinical outcome and hence may be used for stratification in future treatment protocols.
AB - Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome has a better prognosis than sporadic pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Most cases of myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome are characterized by additional cytogenetic changes besides the constitutional trisomy 21, but their potential prognostic impact is not known. We, therefore, conducted an international retrospective study of clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, treatment, and outcome of 451 children with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome. All karyotypes were centrally reviewed before assigning patients to subgroups. The overall 7-year event-free survival for the entire cohort was 78% (±2%), with the overall survival rate being 79% (±2%), the cumulative incidence of relapse 12% (±2%), and the cumulative incidence of toxic death 7% (±1%). Outcome estimates showed large differences across the different cytogenetic subgroups. Based on the cumulative incidence of relapse, we could risk-stratify patients into two groups: cases with a normal karyotype (n=103) with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (21%±4%) than cases with an aberrant karyotype (n=255) with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 9% (±2%) (P=0.004). Multivariate analyses revealed that white blood cell count ≥20×109/L and age >3 years were independent predictors for poor event-free survival, while normal karyotype independently predicted inferior overall survival, event-free survival, and relapse-free survival. In conclusion, this study showed large differences in outcome within patients with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome and identified novel prognostic groups that predicted clinical outcome and hence may be used for stratification in future treatment protocols.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896716441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896716441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2013.089425
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2013.089425
M3 - Article
C2 - 23935021
AN - SCOPUS:84896716441
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 99
SP - 299
EP - 307
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 2
ER -