TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel retrobulbar anesthesia technique through the sub-Tenon's space using a sharp needle in a blunt cannula
AU - Sugimoto, Mitsuo
AU - Horiguchi, Masayuki
AU - Tanikawa, Atsuhiro
AU - Shimada, Yoshiaki
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The authors developed a new technique for retrobulbar anesthesia and compared it with the conventional transcuta-neous method in 223 eyes undergoing vitrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the new technique, a 24-mm-long 19-gauge curved cannula with a 27-gauge straight needle with an oval tip was inserted into the sub-Tenon's space, and then the oval-tipped needle was replaced with a 50-mm-long 25-gauge curved needle. Anesthetic was then injected into the muscle cone from the syringe. The authors compared 118 eyes undergoing vitrectomy with the new technique and 105 eyes undergoing the procedure with conventional anesthesia. RESULTS: The pain scores were 0.1 ± 0.32 for the new technique and 1.57 ± 0.73 for the conventional technique (P < .001). Additional anesthetic required was 0.1 ± 0.33 mL using the new technique and 0.3 ± 0.68 mL using the conventional method (P = .03). CONCLUSION: This novel approach to retrobulbar anesthesia using a guarded cannula is safe and effective, causing less pain than the conventional technique.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The authors developed a new technique for retrobulbar anesthesia and compared it with the conventional transcuta-neous method in 223 eyes undergoing vitrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the new technique, a 24-mm-long 19-gauge curved cannula with a 27-gauge straight needle with an oval tip was inserted into the sub-Tenon's space, and then the oval-tipped needle was replaced with a 50-mm-long 25-gauge curved needle. Anesthetic was then injected into the muscle cone from the syringe. The authors compared 118 eyes undergoing vitrectomy with the new technique and 105 eyes undergoing the procedure with conventional anesthesia. RESULTS: The pain scores were 0.1 ± 0.32 for the new technique and 1.57 ± 0.73 for the conventional technique (P < .001). Additional anesthetic required was 0.1 ± 0.33 mL using the new technique and 0.3 ± 0.68 mL using the conventional method (P = .03). CONCLUSION: This novel approach to retrobulbar anesthesia using a guarded cannula is safe and effective, causing less pain than the conventional technique.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884943167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884943167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/23258160-20130909-11
DO - 10.3928/23258160-20130909-11
M3 - Article
C2 - 24044712
AN - SCOPUS:84884943167
SN - 2325-8160
VL - 44
SP - 483
EP - 486
JO - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
JF - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
IS - 5
ER -