Opposite effects induced by low and high doses of apomorphine on single-trial passive avoidance learning in mice

Kenji Ichihara, Toshitaka Nabeshima, Tsutomu Kameyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of apomorphine (0.0125-1 mg/kg, SC), a dopamine (DA) agonist, on passive avoidance learning were assessed in mice which received brief and long foot-shocks in a training test. At low doses, apomorphine stimulates DA autoreceptors. With a shock of brief duration, apomorphine at a low dose (0.05 mg/kg), enhanced the avoidance learning when it was administered 20 min before the training test or the retention test. At high doses, apomorphine stimulates postsynaptic DA receptors. With a shock of long duration, apomorphine at a high dose (1 mg/kg), impaired the avoidance learning when it was administered 20 min before the training test or the retention test. However, apomorphine (0.05 and 1 mg/kg) given immediately after the training test did not have any effect on the avoidance behavior with shocks of either brief or long durations. Apomorphine-induced enhancement of passive avoidance learning was antagonized by sulpiride, but not by haloperidol. These results show that apomorphine induced the opposite effects on the passive avoidance learning depending on the dose or on the reinforcement intensity and suggest that the central DA system may play an important role in modulating memory processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-113
Number of pages7
JournalPharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05-1988
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opposite effects induced by low and high doses of apomorphine on single-trial passive avoidance learning in mice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this