Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy

Daigo Arakawa, Naoki Ohmiya, Masanao Nakamura, Wataru Honda, Osamu Shirai, Akihiro Itoh, Yoshiki Hirooka, Yasumasa Niwa, Osamu Maeda, Takafumi Ando, Hidemi Goto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

143 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) have been useful in managing obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). Objective: This study compared diagnostic yields of OGIB between DBE and VCE, and evaluated the outcome after DBE. Design: A single-center retrospective study. Setting: A tertiary-referral hospital. Patients: Between June 2003 and February 2007, 162 consecutive patients with OGIB were enrolled and treated. The diagnostic yield between VCE and DBE was compared in 74 patients. Main Outcome Measurements: Comparison of diagnostic yields between DBE and VCE, and the prognosis after DBE. Results: Of 162 patients, 95 (59%) were diagnosed with small-bowel diseases. They were treated by medical, enteroscopic, and surgical therapies (n = 35, 30, and 30, respectively). A comparison of the overall diagnostic yield between DBE (64%) and VCE (54%) was not significantly different. The 4 VCE-positive DBE-negative cases were because of inaccessibility of DBE. The 11 VCE-negative DBE-positive cases were because of a failure to detect lesions in the proximal small bowel and the Roux-en-Y loop, and because of diverticula. At a median follow-up of 555 days after DBE, 11 patients with small-bowel diseases developed rebleeding; all were treated by enteroscopic or medical therapies. Vascular diseases, comorbidities, especially portal hypertensive disease and chronic renal failure that required hemodialysis, and severe anemia (Hb ≤7.0 g/dL) were associated with rebleeding. Limitations: A retrospective comparative study, and participation bias. Conclusions: A complementary combination between DBE and VCE was useful for the management of OGIB. In particular, patients with vascular disease, comorbidities, and severe anemia should be intensively treated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-874
Number of pages9
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume69
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Hemorrhage
Vascular Diseases
Comorbidity
Anemia
Retrospective Studies
Roux-en-Y Anastomosis
Diverticulum
Tertiary Care Centers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Arakawa, Daigo ; Ohmiya, Naoki ; Nakamura, Masanao ; Honda, Wataru ; Shirai, Osamu ; Itoh, Akihiro ; Hirooka, Yoshiki ; Niwa, Yasumasa ; Maeda, Osamu ; Ando, Takafumi ; Goto, Hidemi. / Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding : diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2009 ; Vol. 69, No. 4. pp. 866-874.
@article{1847c3650f744637aab17b5418532310,
title = "Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy",
abstract = "Background: Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) have been useful in managing obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). Objective: This study compared diagnostic yields of OGIB between DBE and VCE, and evaluated the outcome after DBE. Design: A single-center retrospective study. Setting: A tertiary-referral hospital. Patients: Between June 2003 and February 2007, 162 consecutive patients with OGIB were enrolled and treated. The diagnostic yield between VCE and DBE was compared in 74 patients. Main Outcome Measurements: Comparison of diagnostic yields between DBE and VCE, and the prognosis after DBE. Results: Of 162 patients, 95 (59{\%}) were diagnosed with small-bowel diseases. They were treated by medical, enteroscopic, and surgical therapies (n = 35, 30, and 30, respectively). A comparison of the overall diagnostic yield between DBE (64{\%}) and VCE (54{\%}) was not significantly different. The 4 VCE-positive DBE-negative cases were because of inaccessibility of DBE. The 11 VCE-negative DBE-positive cases were because of a failure to detect lesions in the proximal small bowel and the Roux-en-Y loop, and because of diverticula. At a median follow-up of 555 days after DBE, 11 patients with small-bowel diseases developed rebleeding; all were treated by enteroscopic or medical therapies. Vascular diseases, comorbidities, especially portal hypertensive disease and chronic renal failure that required hemodialysis, and severe anemia (Hb ≤7.0 g/dL) were associated with rebleeding. Limitations: A retrospective comparative study, and participation bias. Conclusions: A complementary combination between DBE and VCE was useful for the management of OGIB. In particular, patients with vascular disease, comorbidities, and severe anemia should be intensively treated.",
author = "Daigo Arakawa and Naoki Ohmiya and Masanao Nakamura and Wataru Honda and Osamu Shirai and Akihiro Itoh and Yoshiki Hirooka and Yasumasa Niwa and Osamu Maeda and Takafumi Ando and Hidemi Goto",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "866--874",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding : diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy. / Arakawa, Daigo; Ohmiya, Naoki; Nakamura, Masanao; Honda, Wataru; Shirai, Osamu; Itoh, Akihiro; Hirooka, Yoshiki; Niwa, Yasumasa; Maeda, Osamu; Ando, Takafumi; Goto, Hidemi.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 69, No. 4, 01.04.2009, p. 866-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding

T2 - diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy

AU - Arakawa, Daigo

AU - Ohmiya, Naoki

AU - Nakamura, Masanao

AU - Honda, Wataru

AU - Shirai, Osamu

AU - Itoh, Akihiro

AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki

AU - Niwa, Yasumasa

AU - Maeda, Osamu

AU - Ando, Takafumi

AU - Goto, Hidemi

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Background: Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) have been useful in managing obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). Objective: This study compared diagnostic yields of OGIB between DBE and VCE, and evaluated the outcome after DBE. Design: A single-center retrospective study. Setting: A tertiary-referral hospital. Patients: Between June 2003 and February 2007, 162 consecutive patients with OGIB were enrolled and treated. The diagnostic yield between VCE and DBE was compared in 74 patients. Main Outcome Measurements: Comparison of diagnostic yields between DBE and VCE, and the prognosis after DBE. Results: Of 162 patients, 95 (59%) were diagnosed with small-bowel diseases. They were treated by medical, enteroscopic, and surgical therapies (n = 35, 30, and 30, respectively). A comparison of the overall diagnostic yield between DBE (64%) and VCE (54%) was not significantly different. The 4 VCE-positive DBE-negative cases were because of inaccessibility of DBE. The 11 VCE-negative DBE-positive cases were because of a failure to detect lesions in the proximal small bowel and the Roux-en-Y loop, and because of diverticula. At a median follow-up of 555 days after DBE, 11 patients with small-bowel diseases developed rebleeding; all were treated by enteroscopic or medical therapies. Vascular diseases, comorbidities, especially portal hypertensive disease and chronic renal failure that required hemodialysis, and severe anemia (Hb ≤7.0 g/dL) were associated with rebleeding. Limitations: A retrospective comparative study, and participation bias. Conclusions: A complementary combination between DBE and VCE was useful for the management of OGIB. In particular, patients with vascular disease, comorbidities, and severe anemia should be intensively treated.

AB - Background: Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) have been useful in managing obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). Objective: This study compared diagnostic yields of OGIB between DBE and VCE, and evaluated the outcome after DBE. Design: A single-center retrospective study. Setting: A tertiary-referral hospital. Patients: Between June 2003 and February 2007, 162 consecutive patients with OGIB were enrolled and treated. The diagnostic yield between VCE and DBE was compared in 74 patients. Main Outcome Measurements: Comparison of diagnostic yields between DBE and VCE, and the prognosis after DBE. Results: Of 162 patients, 95 (59%) were diagnosed with small-bowel diseases. They were treated by medical, enteroscopic, and surgical therapies (n = 35, 30, and 30, respectively). A comparison of the overall diagnostic yield between DBE (64%) and VCE (54%) was not significantly different. The 4 VCE-positive DBE-negative cases were because of inaccessibility of DBE. The 11 VCE-negative DBE-positive cases were because of a failure to detect lesions in the proximal small bowel and the Roux-en-Y loop, and because of diverticula. At a median follow-up of 555 days after DBE, 11 patients with small-bowel diseases developed rebleeding; all were treated by enteroscopic or medical therapies. Vascular diseases, comorbidities, especially portal hypertensive disease and chronic renal failure that required hemodialysis, and severe anemia (Hb ≤7.0 g/dL) were associated with rebleeding. Limitations: A retrospective comparative study, and participation bias. Conclusions: A complementary combination between DBE and VCE was useful for the management of OGIB. In particular, patients with vascular disease, comorbidities, and severe anemia should be intensively treated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649124678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649124678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 19136098

AN - SCOPUS:62649124678

VL - 69

SP - 866

EP - 874

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -