TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in elderly patients
T2 - a propensity score matching analysis
AU - Ebihara, Yuma
AU - Kurashima, Yo
AU - Watanabe, Yusuke
AU - Tanaka, Kimitaka
AU - Matsui, Aya
AU - Nakanishi, Yoshitsugu
AU - Asano, Toshimichi
AU - Noji, Takehiro
AU - Nakamura, Toru
AU - Murakami, Soichi
AU - Tsuchikawa, Takahiro
AU - Okamura, Keisuke
AU - Murakami, Yoshihiro
AU - Murakawa, Katsuhiko
AU - Nakamura, Fumitaka
AU - Morita, Takayuki
AU - Okushiba, Shunichi
AU - Shichinohe, Toshiaki
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Purpose: This study evaluated the short-term outcomes and prognosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years in a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 440 patients who underwent curative LTG for gastric cancer at six institutions between January 2004 and December 2018. Patients were categorized into an elderly patient group (EG; age ≥ 80 years) and non-elderly patient group (non-EG; age < 80 years). Patients were matched using the following propensity score covariates: sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, extent of lymph node dissection, and Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma stage. Short-term outcomes and prognoses were compared. Results: We identified 37 propensity score-matched pairs. The median operative time was significantly shorter, and postoperative stay was longer in the EG. In terms of postoperative outcomes, the rates of all complications were comparable. The median follow-up period of the EG and non-EG was 11.5 (1–106.4) months and 35.7 (1–110.0) months, respectively; there were significant differences in 5-year overall survival between the two groups (EG, 58.5% vs. non-EG, 91.5%; P = 0.031). However, there were no significant differences in 5-year disease-specific survival (EG, 62.1% vs. non-EG, 91.5%; P = 0.068) or 5-year disease-free survival (EG, 52.9% vs. non-EG, 60.8%; P = 0.132). Conclusions: LTG seems to be safe and feasible in elderly patients. LTG had a limited effect on morbidity, disease recurrence, and survival in elderly patients. Therefore, age should not prevent elderly patients from benefitting from LTG.
AB - Purpose: This study evaluated the short-term outcomes and prognosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years in a multicenter retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 440 patients who underwent curative LTG for gastric cancer at six institutions between January 2004 and December 2018. Patients were categorized into an elderly patient group (EG; age ≥ 80 years) and non-elderly patient group (non-EG; age < 80 years). Patients were matched using the following propensity score covariates: sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, extent of lymph node dissection, and Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma stage. Short-term outcomes and prognoses were compared. Results: We identified 37 propensity score-matched pairs. The median operative time was significantly shorter, and postoperative stay was longer in the EG. In terms of postoperative outcomes, the rates of all complications were comparable. The median follow-up period of the EG and non-EG was 11.5 (1–106.4) months and 35.7 (1–110.0) months, respectively; there were significant differences in 5-year overall survival between the two groups (EG, 58.5% vs. non-EG, 91.5%; P = 0.031). However, there were no significant differences in 5-year disease-specific survival (EG, 62.1% vs. non-EG, 91.5%; P = 0.068) or 5-year disease-free survival (EG, 52.9% vs. non-EG, 60.8%; P = 0.132). Conclusions: LTG seems to be safe and feasible in elderly patients. LTG had a limited effect on morbidity, disease recurrence, and survival in elderly patients. Therefore, age should not prevent elderly patients from benefitting from LTG.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123621879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123621879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00423-022-02447-2
DO - 10.1007/s00423-022-02447-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35080645
AN - SCOPUS:85123621879
SN - 1435-2443
VL - 407
SP - 1461
EP - 1469
JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -