Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005

Kiyosu Taniguchi, Shuji Hashimoto, Miyuki Kawado, Yoshitaka Murakami, Michiko Izumida, Akiko Ohta, Yuki Tada, Mika Shigematsu, Yoshinori Yasui, Masaki Nagai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. Methods: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. Results: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. Conclusions: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Epidemiology
Volume17
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-12-2007

Fingerprint

Communicable Diseases
Japan
Mandatory Reporting
Information Dissemination
Information Systems
Incidence
Research
Population
cyhalothrin

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Taniguchi, K., Hashimoto, S., Kawado, M., Murakami, Y., Izumida, M., Ohta, A., ... Nagai, M. (2007). Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005. Journal of Epidemiology, 17(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3
Taniguchi, Kiyosu ; Hashimoto, Shuji ; Kawado, Miyuki ; Murakami, Yoshitaka ; Izumida, Michiko ; Ohta, Akiko ; Tada, Yuki ; Shigematsu, Mika ; Yasui, Yoshinori ; Nagai, Masaki. / Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005. In: Journal of Epidemiology. 2007 ; Vol. 17, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{08bab10451f54a6ca862eb5f47d53eb4,
title = "Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005",
abstract = "Background: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the {"}New{"} Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. Methods: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. Results: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. Conclusions: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method.",
author = "Kiyosu Taniguchi and Shuji Hashimoto and Miyuki Kawado and Yoshitaka Murakami and Michiko Izumida and Akiko Ohta and Yuki Tada and Mika Shigematsu and Yoshinori Yasui and Masaki Nagai",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2188/jea.17.S3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0917-5040",
publisher = "Japan Epidemiology Association",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Taniguchi, K, Hashimoto, S, Kawado, M, Murakami, Y, Izumida, M, Ohta, A, Tada, Y, Shigematsu, M, Yasui, Y & Nagai, M 2007, 'Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005', Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 17, no. SUPPL. 1. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.17.S3

Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005. / Taniguchi, Kiyosu; Hashimoto, Shuji; Kawado, Miyuki; Murakami, Yoshitaka; Izumida, Michiko; Ohta, Akiko; Tada, Yuki; Shigematsu, Mika; Yasui, Yoshinori; Nagai, Masaki.

In: Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 17, No. SUPPL. 1, 01.12.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overview of infectious disease surveillance system in Japan, 1999-2005

AU - Taniguchi, Kiyosu

AU - Hashimoto, Shuji

AU - Kawado, Miyuki

AU - Murakami, Yoshitaka

AU - Izumida, Michiko

AU - Ohta, Akiko

AU - Tada, Yuki

AU - Shigematsu, Mika

AU - Yasui, Yoshinori

AU - Nagai, Masaki

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Background: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. Methods: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. Results: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. Conclusions: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method.

AB - Background: In 1999 the Communicable Disease Prevention Law of Japan was completely revised into the "New" Infectious Disease Control Law, which reiterated the importance of surveillance and information dissemination and re-organized the surveillance system. This paper is an attempt to illustrate the potential impact of the new surveillance system through a description of the existing surveillance system and data before and after the revision. Methods: After a historical review of surveillance system in Japan, the current surveillance system is described. Data sets of actual case numbers reported and incidence rate per 1,000,000 population are compared before and after the revision. Results: Comparison of the data between the 2 periods revealed that most of the diseases have had declining trends after the new law was enacted with several exceptions. However, although no major break in continuity is observed in seriously perceived disease, in milder diseases there are striking gaps between the numbers reported in the mandatory and sentinel reporting framework. Sentinel reporting framework maintained the continuity of data without major gaps. Conclusions: From this perspective, the new surveillance system with two different frameworks of mandatory reporting for severe diseases and sentinel reporting for milder diseases seems to be working well. But continuous efforts should be made for evaluation and improvement of surveillance system and risk communication through the research on data analysis and effective communication method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40249086863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40249086863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2188/jea.17.S3

DO - 10.2188/jea.17.S3

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18239339

AN - SCOPUS:40249086863

VL - 17

JO - Journal of Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0917-5040

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -