TY - JOUR
T1 - Patch Testing with Formaldehyde 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) Detects More Contact Allergy to Formaldehyde Than 1.0%
AU - Isaksson, Marléne
AU - Ale, Iris
AU - Andersen, Klaus E.
AU - Goh, Chee Leok
AU - Goossens, An
AU - Jerajani, Hemangi
AU - Matsunaga, Kayoko
AU - McFadden, John
AU - Bruze, Magnus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Background The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group increased the patch test concentration of formaldehyde from 1.0% aqueous (aq) to 2.0% aq (in 2011). Objective This study was designed to investigate the outcome of the decision. Methods Consecutive dermatitis patients in 8 different clinics were patch tested with formaldehyde 1.0% aq and 2.0% aq. The test solutions were applied with a micropipette to the filter paper discs in the respective chamber. Results A total of 2778 patients were tested with 1.0% aq and 2766 to 2.0% aq. Sixty-five patients (2.3%, calculated from 2766 tested, to 2.0% aq) had positive patch test reactions interpreted as contact allergy to formaldehyde. This is a rather low frequency. Of these 65, 46 were women (46/1703 [2.7%]) and 19 were men (19/1063 [1.8%]). Thirty-six reacted only to 2.0% aq, 21 patients reacted to both concentrations, and 8 patients reacted only to 1.0% aq. Significantly, more patients reacted to 2.0% aq compared with 1.0% aq (P < 0.001). There was no significant sex difference. A total of 0.8% irritant reactions were recorded to formaldehyde 2.0% aq and 0.1% to 1.0% aq. Conclusions The increased formaldehyde patch test concentration to 2.0% aq revealed more formaldehyde contact allergy.
AB - Background The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group increased the patch test concentration of formaldehyde from 1.0% aqueous (aq) to 2.0% aq (in 2011). Objective This study was designed to investigate the outcome of the decision. Methods Consecutive dermatitis patients in 8 different clinics were patch tested with formaldehyde 1.0% aq and 2.0% aq. The test solutions were applied with a micropipette to the filter paper discs in the respective chamber. Results A total of 2778 patients were tested with 1.0% aq and 2766 to 2.0% aq. Sixty-five patients (2.3%, calculated from 2766 tested, to 2.0% aq) had positive patch test reactions interpreted as contact allergy to formaldehyde. This is a rather low frequency. Of these 65, 46 were women (46/1703 [2.7%]) and 19 were men (19/1063 [1.8%]). Thirty-six reacted only to 2.0% aq, 21 patients reacted to both concentrations, and 8 patients reacted only to 1.0% aq. Significantly, more patients reacted to 2.0% aq compared with 1.0% aq (P < 0.001). There was no significant sex difference. A total of 0.8% irritant reactions were recorded to formaldehyde 2.0% aq and 0.1% to 1.0% aq. Conclusions The increased formaldehyde patch test concentration to 2.0% aq revealed more formaldehyde contact allergy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075056791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075056791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000510
DO - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000510
M3 - Article
C2 - 31730552
AN - SCOPUS:85075056791
SN - 1710-3568
VL - 30
SP - 342
EP - 346
JO - Dermatitis
JF - Dermatitis
IS - 6
ER -