Phase III trial comparing oral S-1 plus carboplatin with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a west Japan oncology group study

  • Isamu Okamoto
  • , Hiroshige Yoshioka
  • , Satoshi Morita
  • , Masahiko Ando
  • , Koji Takeda
  • , Takashi Seto
  • , Nobuyuki Yamamoto
  • , Hideo Saka
  • , Kazuhiro Asami
  • , Tomonori Hirashima
  • , Shinzoh Kudoh
  • , Miyako Satouchi
  • , Norihiko Ikeda
  • , Yasuo Iwamoto
  • , Toshiyuki Sawa
  • , Masaki Miyazaki
  • , Kenji Tamura
  • , Takayasu Kurata
  • , Masahiro Fukuoka
  • , Kazuhiko Nakagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial was to determine whether treatment with carboplatin plus the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 was noninferior versus that with carboplatin plus paclitaxel with regard to overall survival (OS) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: A total of 564 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1 plus oral S-1 (40 mg/m 2 twice per day) on days 1 to 14 or carboplatin (area under the curve, 6) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m 2) on day 1 every 21 days. Results: At the planned interim analysis, with a total of 268 death events available, the study passed the O'Brien-Fleming boundary of 0.0080 for a positive result and noninferiority of carboplatin and S-1 compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel was confirmed for OS (hazard ratio, 0.928; 99.2% CI, 0.671 to 1.283). Median OS was 15.2 months in the carboplatin and S-1 arm and 13.3 months in the carboplatin and paclitaxel arm, with 1-year survival rates of 57.3% and 55.5%, respectively. Rates of leukopenia or neutropenia of grade 3/4, febrile neutropenia, alopecia, and neuropathy were more frequent in the carboplatin and paclitaxel arm, whereas thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were more common in the carboplatin and S-1 arm. The carboplatin and S-1 arm had significantly more dose delays than the carboplatin and paclitaxel arm. Conclusion: Oral S-1 with carboplatin was noninferior in terms of OS compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC, and is thus a valid treatment option.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5240-5246
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume28
Issue number36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20-12-2010
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III trial comparing oral S-1 plus carboplatin with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a west Japan oncology group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this