TY - JOUR
T1 - Pragmatic Randomized Study of Afatinib Versus Chemotherapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations
T2 - ACHILLES/TORG1834
AU - Thoracic Oncology Research Group and all ACHILLES investigators
AU - Miura, Satoru
AU - Tanaka, Hiroshi
AU - Misumi, Toshihiro
AU - Yoshioka, Hiroshige
AU - Tokito, Takaaki
AU - Fukuhara, Tatsuro
AU - Sato, Yuki
AU - Shiraishi, Yoshimasa
AU - Naoki, Katsuhiko
AU - Akamatsu, Hiroaki
AU - Yamaguchi, Ou
AU - Yokoyama, Toshihide
AU - Kuyama, Shoichi
AU - Nishino, Kazumi
AU - Furuya, Naoki
AU - Kurata, Takayasu
AU - Kato, Terufumi
AU - Ikeda, Satoshi
AU - Horinouchi, Hidehito
AU - Ichihara, Eiki
AU - Mori, Masahide
AU - Takiguchi, Yuichi
AU - Tanaka, Kentaro
AU - Goto, Yasuhiro
AU - Okamoto, Hiroaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025/6/20
Y1 - 2025/6/20
N2 - PURPOSE To our knowledge, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 trial is the first randomized study comparing afatinib and chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS This randomized, open-label study was performed at 51 Japanese institutions and recruited treatment-naïve patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations, excluding exon 20 insertions and T790M mutations. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive afatinib (30 or 40 mg orally, at the treating physician's discretion) or a combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and pemetrexed, followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety. A prespecified interim analysis was planned to provide clinically meaningful information promptly, along with a crossover recommendation if necessary. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were enrolled between March 2019 and February 2023. In the interim analysis, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving afatinib than in those undergoing chemotherapy (10.6 v 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.421 [95% CI, 0.251 to 0.706]; P =.0010). ORRs to afatinib were similar across the overall population and among participants with major uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and S768I), compound, and other mutations (61.7%, 55.8%, 72.7%, and 60.0%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were diarrhea, paronychia, and rash for afatinib, and appetite loss and nausea for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Afatinib should be considered the standard initial therapy for patients with NSCLC with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations.
AB - PURPOSE To our knowledge, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 trial is the first randomized study comparing afatinib and chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS This randomized, open-label study was performed at 51 Japanese institutions and recruited treatment-naïve patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations, excluding exon 20 insertions and T790M mutations. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive afatinib (30 or 40 mg orally, at the treating physician's discretion) or a combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and pemetrexed, followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety. A prespecified interim analysis was planned to provide clinically meaningful information promptly, along with a crossover recommendation if necessary. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were enrolled between March 2019 and February 2023. In the interim analysis, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving afatinib than in those undergoing chemotherapy (10.6 v 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.421 [95% CI, 0.251 to 0.706]; P =.0010). ORRs to afatinib were similar across the overall population and among participants with major uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and S768I), compound, and other mutations (61.7%, 55.8%, 72.7%, and 60.0%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were diarrhea, paronychia, and rash for afatinib, and appetite loss and nausea for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Afatinib should be considered the standard initial therapy for patients with NSCLC with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004586053
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004586053#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1200/JCO-24-02007
DO - 10.1200/JCO-24-02007
M3 - Article
C2 - 40239133
AN - SCOPUS:105004586053
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 43
SP - 2049
EP - 2058
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 18
ER -