TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning
AU - Nishi, Hidehisa
AU - Oishi, Naoya
AU - Ishii, Akira
AU - Ono, Isao
AU - Ogura, Takenori
AU - Sunohara, Tadashi
AU - Chihara, Hideo
AU - Fukumitsu, Ryu
AU - Okawa, Masakazu
AU - Yamana, Norikazu
AU - Imamura, Hirotoshi
AU - Sadamasa, Nobutake
AU - Hatano, Taketo
AU - Nakahara, Ichiro
AU - Sakai, Nobuyuki
AU - Miyamoto, Susumu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Background and Purpose - The clinical course of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is a multifactorial process with various prognostic factors. We aimed to model this process with machine learning and predict the long-term clinical outcome of LVO before endovascular treatment and to compare our method with previously developed pretreatment scoring methods. Methods - The derivation cohort included 387 LVO patients, and the external validation cohort included 115 LVO patients with anterior circulation who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy. The statistical model with logistic regression without regularization and machine learning algorithms, such as regularized logistic regression, linear support vector machine, and random forest, were used to predict good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days) with standard and multiple pretreatment clinical variables. Five previously reported pretreatment scoring methods (the Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy score, the Stroke Prognostication Using Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale index, the Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events score, the Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy score, and the Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2 score) were compared with these models for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results - The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of random forest, which was the worst among the machine learning algorithms, was significantly higher than those of the standard statistical model and the best model among the previously reported pretreatment scoring methods in the derivation (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.85±0.07 for random forest, 0.78±0.08 for logistic regression without regularization, and 0.77±0.09 for Stroke Prognostication using Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) and validation cohorts (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.87±0.01 for random forest, 0.56±0.07 for logistic regression without regularization, and 0.83±0.00 for Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy). Conclusions - Machine learning methods with multiple pretreatment clinical variables can predict clinical outcomes of patients with anterior circulation LVO who undergo mechanical thrombectomy more accurately than previously developed pretreatment scoring methods.
AB - Background and Purpose - The clinical course of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is a multifactorial process with various prognostic factors. We aimed to model this process with machine learning and predict the long-term clinical outcome of LVO before endovascular treatment and to compare our method with previously developed pretreatment scoring methods. Methods - The derivation cohort included 387 LVO patients, and the external validation cohort included 115 LVO patients with anterior circulation who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy. The statistical model with logistic regression without regularization and machine learning algorithms, such as regularized logistic regression, linear support vector machine, and random forest, were used to predict good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days) with standard and multiple pretreatment clinical variables. Five previously reported pretreatment scoring methods (the Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy score, the Stroke Prognostication Using Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale index, the Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events score, the Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy score, and the Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy 2 score) were compared with these models for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results - The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of random forest, which was the worst among the machine learning algorithms, was significantly higher than those of the standard statistical model and the best model among the previously reported pretreatment scoring methods in the derivation (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.85±0.07 for random forest, 0.78±0.08 for logistic regression without regularization, and 0.77±0.09 for Stroke Prognostication using Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) and validation cohorts (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.87±0.01 for random forest, 0.56±0.07 for logistic regression without regularization, and 0.83±0.00 for Pittsburgh Response to Endovascular Therapy). Conclusions - Machine learning methods with multiple pretreatment clinical variables can predict clinical outcomes of patients with anterior circulation LVO who undergo mechanical thrombectomy more accurately than previously developed pretreatment scoring methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071711809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071711809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025411
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025411
M3 - Article
C2 - 31409267
AN - SCOPUS:85071711809
SN - 0039-2499
VL - 50
SP - 2379
EP - 2388
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
IS - 9
ER -