TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of response to remission induction therapy by gene expression profiling of peripheral blood in Japanese patients with microscopic polyangiitis
AU - Research Committee of the Intractable Vasculitis Syndrome and the Research Committee of the Intractable Renal Disease of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
AU - Ishizu, Akihiro
AU - Tomaru, Utano
AU - Masuda, Sakiko
AU - Sada, Ken ei
AU - Amano, Koichi
AU - Harigai, Masayoshi
AU - Kawaguchi, Yasushi
AU - Arimura, Yoshihiro
AU - Yamagata, Kunihiro
AU - Ozaki, Shoichi
AU - Dobashi, Hiroaki
AU - Homma, Sakae
AU - Okada, Yasunori
AU - Sugiyama, Hitoshi
AU - Usui, Joichi
AU - Tsuboi, Naotake
AU - Matsuo, Seiichi
AU - Makino, Hirofumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/5/31
Y1 - 2017/5/31
N2 - Background: Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), which is classified as an anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated small vessel vasculitis, is one of the most frequent primary vasculitides in Japan. We earlier nominated 16 genes (IRF7, IFIT1, IFIT5, OASL, CLC, GBP-1, PSMB9, HERC5, CCR1, CD36, MS4A4A, BIRC4BP, PLSCR1, DEFA1/DEFA3, DEFA4, and COL9A2) as predictors of response to remission induction therapy against MPA. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of prediction using these 16 predictors. Methods: Thirty-nine MPA patients were selected randomly and retrospectively from the Japanese nationwide RemIT-JAV-RPGN cohort and enrolled in this study. Remission induction therapy was conducted according to the Guidelines of Treatment for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. Response to remission induction therapy was predicted by profiling the altered expressions of the 16 predictors between the period before and 1 week after the beginning of treatment. Remission is defined as the absence of clinical manifestations of active vasculitis (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score 2003: 0 or 1 point). Persistent remission for 18 months is regarded as a "good response," whereas no remission or relapse after remission is regarded as a "poor response." Results: "Poor" and "good" responses were predicted in 7 and 32 patients, respectively. Five out of 7 patients with "poor" prediction and 1 out of 32 patients with "good" prediction experienced relapse after remission. One out of 7 patients with "poor" prediction was not conducted to remission. Accordingly, the sensitivity and specificity to predict poor response was 85.7% (6/7) and 96.9% (31/32), respectively. Conclusions: Response to remission induction therapy can be predicted by monitoring the altered expressions of the 16 predictors in the peripheral blood at an early point of treatment in MPA patients.
AB - Background: Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), which is classified as an anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated small vessel vasculitis, is one of the most frequent primary vasculitides in Japan. We earlier nominated 16 genes (IRF7, IFIT1, IFIT5, OASL, CLC, GBP-1, PSMB9, HERC5, CCR1, CD36, MS4A4A, BIRC4BP, PLSCR1, DEFA1/DEFA3, DEFA4, and COL9A2) as predictors of response to remission induction therapy against MPA. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of prediction using these 16 predictors. Methods: Thirty-nine MPA patients were selected randomly and retrospectively from the Japanese nationwide RemIT-JAV-RPGN cohort and enrolled in this study. Remission induction therapy was conducted according to the Guidelines of Treatment for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. Response to remission induction therapy was predicted by profiling the altered expressions of the 16 predictors between the period before and 1 week after the beginning of treatment. Remission is defined as the absence of clinical manifestations of active vasculitis (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score 2003: 0 or 1 point). Persistent remission for 18 months is regarded as a "good response," whereas no remission or relapse after remission is regarded as a "poor response." Results: "Poor" and "good" responses were predicted in 7 and 32 patients, respectively. Five out of 7 patients with "poor" prediction and 1 out of 32 patients with "good" prediction experienced relapse after remission. One out of 7 patients with "poor" prediction was not conducted to remission. Accordingly, the sensitivity and specificity to predict poor response was 85.7% (6/7) and 96.9% (31/32), respectively. Conclusions: Response to remission induction therapy can be predicted by monitoring the altered expressions of the 16 predictors in the peripheral blood at an early point of treatment in MPA patients.
KW - Gene profiling
KW - Microscopic polyangiitis
KW - Peripheral blood
KW - Prediction of response to treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020054415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020054415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13075-017-1328-7
DO - 10.1186/s13075-017-1328-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 28569178
AN - SCOPUS:85020054415
SN - 1478-6354
VL - 19
JO - Arthritis Research and Therapy
JF - Arthritis Research and Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 117
ER -