TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive Probability of the Global Alignment and Proportion Score for the Development of Mechanical Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Asian Patients
AU - Yagi, Mitsuru
AU - Daimon, Kenshi
AU - Hosogane, Naobumi
AU - Okada, Eijiro
AU - Suzuki, Satoshi
AU - Tsuji, Osahiko
AU - Nagoshi, Narihito
AU - Fujita, Nobuyuji
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Watanabe, Kota
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/15
Y1 - 2021/1/15
N2 - Study Design.This is a multicenter retrospective review of 257 surgically treated consecutive ASD patients who had a minimum of five fused segments, completed a 2-year follow-up (53 ± 19 yrs, females: 236 [92%]).Objective.This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.Summary of Background Data.The GAP score is a recently established risk stratification model for MF following ASD surgery. However, the predictive ability of the GAP score is not well studied. This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.Methods.Comparisons of the immediate postoperative GAP scores between MF the and MF-free groups were performed. We evaluated the discriminative ability of the GAP score based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Cuzick test was performed to determine whether there is a trend between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery.Results.No difference was observed in the GAP score between the MF and MF-free groups (MF vs. MF-free; GAP: 5.9 ± 3.3 vs. 5.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.07). The Cuzick analysis showed no trend between the GAP score and the risk for MF or revision surgery. Likewise, the MF rate was not correlated with the GAP score, as shown by the ROC curve (AUC of 0.56 [95% CI 0.48-0.63], P = 0.124). Univariate logistic regression confirmed no associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery (MF; moderately disproportioned [MD]: OR: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.3-1.2], P = 0.17, severely disproportioned [SD]: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.6-2.3], P = 0.69, revision surgery; MD: OR: 0.8 [95% CI: 0.2-2.8], P = 0.71, SD: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.9-8.7], P = 0.08).Conclusion.In this multicenter study, in an Asian ASD patient cohort, the GAP score was not associated with the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Additional studies on the predictive ability of the GAP score in different patient cohorts are warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.
AB - Study Design.This is a multicenter retrospective review of 257 surgically treated consecutive ASD patients who had a minimum of five fused segments, completed a 2-year follow-up (53 ± 19 yrs, females: 236 [92%]).Objective.This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.Summary of Background Data.The GAP score is a recently established risk stratification model for MF following ASD surgery. However, the predictive ability of the GAP score is not well studied. This study aimed to validate the predictive probability of the GAP score in an Asian ASD patient cohort.Methods.Comparisons of the immediate postoperative GAP scores between MF the and MF-free groups were performed. We evaluated the discriminative ability of the GAP score based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Cuzick test was performed to determine whether there is a trend between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery.Results.No difference was observed in the GAP score between the MF and MF-free groups (MF vs. MF-free; GAP: 5.9 ± 3.3 vs. 5.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.07). The Cuzick analysis showed no trend between the GAP score and the risk for MF or revision surgery. Likewise, the MF rate was not correlated with the GAP score, as shown by the ROC curve (AUC of 0.56 [95% CI 0.48-0.63], P = 0.124). Univariate logistic regression confirmed no associations between the GAP score and the incidence of MF or revision surgery (MF; moderately disproportioned [MD]: OR: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.3-1.2], P = 0.17, severely disproportioned [SD]: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.6-2.3], P = 0.69, revision surgery; MD: OR: 0.8 [95% CI: 0.2-2.8], P = 0.71, SD: OR: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.9-8.7], P = 0.08).Conclusion.In this multicenter study, in an Asian ASD patient cohort, the GAP score was not associated with the incidence of MF or revision surgery. Additional studies on the predictive ability of the GAP score in different patient cohorts are warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - corrective spine surgery
KW - global alignment and proportion score
KW - mechanical complication
KW - predictive model
KW - risk stratification
KW - scoliosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098814077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098814077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003738
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003738
M3 - Article
C2 - 33038191
AN - SCOPUS:85098814077
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 46
SP - E80-E86
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 2
ER -