TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Implication of Histopathologic Indicators in Salivary Duct Carcinoma
T2 - Proposal of a Novel Histologic Risk Stratification Model
AU - Nakaguro, Masato
AU - Sato, Yukiko
AU - Tada, Yuichiro
AU - Kawakita, Daisuke
AU - Hirai, Hideaki
AU - Urano, Makoto
AU - Shimura, Tomotaka
AU - Tsukahara, Kiyoaki
AU - Kano, Satoshi
AU - Ozawa, Hiroyuki
AU - Okami, Kenji
AU - Sato, Yuichiro
AU - Fushimi, Chihiro
AU - Shimizu, Akira
AU - Takase, Soichiro
AU - Okada, Takuro
AU - Sato, Hiroki
AU - Imanishi, Yorihisa
AU - Otsuka, Kuninori
AU - Watanabe, Yoshihiro
AU - Sakai, Akihiro
AU - Ebisumoto, Koji
AU - Togashi, Takafumi
AU - Ueki, Yushi
AU - Ota, Hisayuki
AU - Saigusa, Natsuki
AU - Takahashi, Hideaki
AU - Ando, Mizuo
AU - Hanazawa, Toyoyuki
AU - Nagao, Toshitaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that histologically resembles high-grade mammary duct carcinoma. Because of the rarity of this entity, data verifying the association between histologic features and patient survival are limited. We conducted a comprehensive histologic review of 151 SDC cases and performed an analysis of the association between various histomorphologic parameters and the clinical outcome with the aim of developing a histologic risk stratification model that predicts the prognosis of SDC patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that prominent nuclear pleomorphism (overall survival [OS]: P=0.013; progression-free survival [PFS]: P=0.019), ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF (PFS: P=0.013), high tumor budding (OS: P=0.011; PFS: P<0.001), and high poorly differentiated clusters (OS: P<0.001; PFS: P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with vascular invasion demonstrated a marginally significant association with shorter PFS (P=0.064) in a multivariate analysis. We proposed a 3-tier histologic risk stratification model based on the total number of positive factors among 4 prognostically relevant parameters (prominent nuclear pleomorphism, ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF, vascular invasion, and high poorly differentiated clusters). The OS and PFS of patients with low-risk (0 to 1 point) (23% of cases), intermediate-risk (2 to 3 points) (54% of cases), and high-risk (4 points) (23% of cases) tumors progressively deteriorated in this order (hazard ratio, 2.13 and 2.28, and 4.99 and 4.50, respectively; Ptrend<0.001). Our histologic risk stratification model could effectively predict patient survival and may be a useful aid to guide clinical decision-making in relation to the management of patients with SDC.
AB - Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that histologically resembles high-grade mammary duct carcinoma. Because of the rarity of this entity, data verifying the association between histologic features and patient survival are limited. We conducted a comprehensive histologic review of 151 SDC cases and performed an analysis of the association between various histomorphologic parameters and the clinical outcome with the aim of developing a histologic risk stratification model that predicts the prognosis of SDC patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that prominent nuclear pleomorphism (overall survival [OS]: P=0.013; progression-free survival [PFS]: P=0.019), ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF (PFS: P=0.013), high tumor budding (OS: P=0.011; PFS: P<0.001), and high poorly differentiated clusters (OS: P<0.001; PFS: P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with vascular invasion demonstrated a marginally significant association with shorter PFS (P=0.064) in a multivariate analysis. We proposed a 3-tier histologic risk stratification model based on the total number of positive factors among 4 prognostically relevant parameters (prominent nuclear pleomorphism, ≥30 mitoses/10 HPF, vascular invasion, and high poorly differentiated clusters). The OS and PFS of patients with low-risk (0 to 1 point) (23% of cases), intermediate-risk (2 to 3 points) (54% of cases), and high-risk (4 points) (23% of cases) tumors progressively deteriorated in this order (hazard ratio, 2.13 and 2.28, and 4.99 and 4.50, respectively; Ptrend<0.001). Our histologic risk stratification model could effectively predict patient survival and may be a useful aid to guide clinical decision-making in relation to the management of patients with SDC.
KW - histologic risk stratification model
KW - poorly differentiated clusters
KW - prognosis
KW - salivary duct carcinoma
KW - tumor budding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075729093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075729093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001413
DO - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001413
M3 - Article
C2 - 31764219
AN - SCOPUS:85075729093
SN - 0147-5185
VL - 44
SP - 526
EP - 535
JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
IS - 4
ER -