Prognostic significance of CD56 expression for ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of T/null cell phenotype

  • R. Suzuki
  • , Y. Kagami
  • , K. Takeuchi
  • , M. Kami
  • , M. Okamoto
  • , R. Ichinohasama
  • , N. Mori
  • , M. Kojima
  • , T. Yoshino
  • , H. Yamabe
  • , M. Shiota
  • , S. Mori
  • , M. Ogura
  • , N. Hamajima
  • , M. Seto
  • , T. Suchi
  • , Y. Morishima
  • , S. Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a distinct entity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, characterized by a proliferation of pleomorphic large lymphoid cells that express CD30. Recent studies have found that a subset of ALCL aberrantly expresses a chimeric anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein as a result of t(2; 5)(p23;q35) or variant translocations. ALK-positive ALCLs feature good prognosis, but some of them lead to poor outcomes. Since CD56 is expressed in some ALCLs, its clinical significance was examined in a series of T/null cell type ALCLs. Of 143 patients, 83 (58%) showed ALK-positive staining, and of 140 patients, 25 (18%) expressed CD56. The ALK-positive subgroup was characterized by a younger age of onset (P < .0001), lower serum lactate dehydrogenase level (P = .01), better performance status (P = .03), less frequent extranodal involvement (P = .01), lower international prognostic index (IPI) categories (P = .002), and superior survival (P = .0009) in comparison with the ALK-negative group, suggesting that ALK is a specific marker defining a distinct subtype. CD56+ cases showed a significantly poor prognosis overall (P = .002) as well as in both ALK-positive and ALK-negative subgroups (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that CD56 is independent of other prognostic factors, including IPI. Although CD56+ cases showed a higher incidence of bone involvement, no other differences in clinicopathologic parameters were found between the CD56+ and CD56- groups. These findings suggest that CD56 is not a marker to identify a distinct subtype of ALCL, but a strong clinical prognostic factor. Effective therapeutic approaches should be explored for high-risk ALCL patients, who can be identified by means of a prognostic model, including CD56. (C) 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2993-3000
Number of pages8
JournalBlood
Volume96
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 01-11-2000
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic significance of CD56 expression for ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of T/null cell phenotype'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this