Proprioceptive weighting ratio for balance control in static standing is reduced in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain

Tadashi Ito, Yoshihito Sakai, Yoshifumi Morita, Kazunori Yamazaki, Kazuma Igarashi, Reiya Nishio, Noritaka Sato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine a specific proprioceptive control strategy during postural balance in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and non-LBP (NLBP). Summary of Background Data: Proprioceptive decline is an important risk factor for decreased balance control in elderly patients with NSLBP. The resulting reduction in proprioception in the trunk or lower legs may contribute to a reduction in postural sway. This study aims to determine the specific proprioceptive control strategy used during postural balance in elderly patients with NSLBP and NLBP and to assess whether this strategy is related to proprioceptive decline in NSLBP. Methods: Pressure displacement centers were determined in 28 elderly patients with NSLBP and 46 elderly patients with NLBP during upright stances on a balance board without the benefit of vision. Gastrocnemius and lumbar multifidus muscle vibratory stimulations at 30, 60, and 240 Hz, respectively, were applied to evaluate the relative contributions of the different proprioceptive signals (relative proprioceptive weighting ratio, RPW) used in postural control. Results: Compared to elderly patients with NLBP, those with NSLBP had a lower RPW at 240Hz and significantly higher RPW at 30Hz. A logistic regression analysis showed that RPW at 240 Hz was independently associated with NSLBP after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: Elderly patients with NSLBP decreased their reliance on ankle strategy (RPW at 240 Hz) and hip strategy (RPW at 30Hz) proprioceptive signals during balance control. The inability to control hip and ankle strategies indicates a deficit of postural control and is hypothesized to result from proprioceptive impairment. Moreover, elderly patients with NSLBP are at higher risk for lower leg proprioceptive decrease (240 Hz) through the NSLBP exacerbation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1704-1709
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume43
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2018

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Postural Balance
Ankle
Hip
Leg
Paraspinal Muscles
Proprioception
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Pressure
Muscles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Ito, Tadashi ; Sakai, Yoshihito ; Morita, Yoshifumi ; Yamazaki, Kazunori ; Igarashi, Kazuma ; Nishio, Reiya ; Sato, Noritaka. / Proprioceptive weighting ratio for balance control in static standing is reduced in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain. In: Spine. 2018 ; Vol. 43, No. 24. pp. 1704-1709.
@article{b2191349bfa14e5c9bfb5dc9c56a8676,
title = "Proprioceptive weighting ratio for balance control in static standing is reduced in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain",
abstract = "Study Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine a specific proprioceptive control strategy during postural balance in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and non-LBP (NLBP). Summary of Background Data: Proprioceptive decline is an important risk factor for decreased balance control in elderly patients with NSLBP. The resulting reduction in proprioception in the trunk or lower legs may contribute to a reduction in postural sway. This study aims to determine the specific proprioceptive control strategy used during postural balance in elderly patients with NSLBP and NLBP and to assess whether this strategy is related to proprioceptive decline in NSLBP. Methods: Pressure displacement centers were determined in 28 elderly patients with NSLBP and 46 elderly patients with NLBP during upright stances on a balance board without the benefit of vision. Gastrocnemius and lumbar multifidus muscle vibratory stimulations at 30, 60, and 240 Hz, respectively, were applied to evaluate the relative contributions of the different proprioceptive signals (relative proprioceptive weighting ratio, RPW) used in postural control. Results: Compared to elderly patients with NLBP, those with NSLBP had a lower RPW at 240Hz and significantly higher RPW at 30Hz. A logistic regression analysis showed that RPW at 240 Hz was independently associated with NSLBP after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: Elderly patients with NSLBP decreased their reliance on ankle strategy (RPW at 240 Hz) and hip strategy (RPW at 30Hz) proprioceptive signals during balance control. The inability to control hip and ankle strategies indicates a deficit of postural control and is hypothesized to result from proprioceptive impairment. Moreover, elderly patients with NSLBP are at higher risk for lower leg proprioceptive decrease (240 Hz) through the NSLBP exacerbation.",
author = "Tadashi Ito and Yoshihito Sakai and Yoshifumi Morita and Kazunori Yamazaki and Kazuma Igarashi and Reiya Nishio and Noritaka Sato",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000002817",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1704--1709",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "24",

}

Proprioceptive weighting ratio for balance control in static standing is reduced in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain. / Ito, Tadashi; Sakai, Yoshihito; Morita, Yoshifumi; Yamazaki, Kazunori; Igarashi, Kazuma; Nishio, Reiya; Sato, Noritaka.

In: Spine, Vol. 43, No. 24, 01.01.2018, p. 1704-1709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proprioceptive weighting ratio for balance control in static standing is reduced in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain

AU - Ito, Tadashi

AU - Sakai, Yoshihito

AU - Morita, Yoshifumi

AU - Yamazaki, Kazunori

AU - Igarashi, Kazuma

AU - Nishio, Reiya

AU - Sato, Noritaka

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Study Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine a specific proprioceptive control strategy during postural balance in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and non-LBP (NLBP). Summary of Background Data: Proprioceptive decline is an important risk factor for decreased balance control in elderly patients with NSLBP. The resulting reduction in proprioception in the trunk or lower legs may contribute to a reduction in postural sway. This study aims to determine the specific proprioceptive control strategy used during postural balance in elderly patients with NSLBP and NLBP and to assess whether this strategy is related to proprioceptive decline in NSLBP. Methods: Pressure displacement centers were determined in 28 elderly patients with NSLBP and 46 elderly patients with NLBP during upright stances on a balance board without the benefit of vision. Gastrocnemius and lumbar multifidus muscle vibratory stimulations at 30, 60, and 240 Hz, respectively, were applied to evaluate the relative contributions of the different proprioceptive signals (relative proprioceptive weighting ratio, RPW) used in postural control. Results: Compared to elderly patients with NLBP, those with NSLBP had a lower RPW at 240Hz and significantly higher RPW at 30Hz. A logistic regression analysis showed that RPW at 240 Hz was independently associated with NSLBP after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: Elderly patients with NSLBP decreased their reliance on ankle strategy (RPW at 240 Hz) and hip strategy (RPW at 30Hz) proprioceptive signals during balance control. The inability to control hip and ankle strategies indicates a deficit of postural control and is hypothesized to result from proprioceptive impairment. Moreover, elderly patients with NSLBP are at higher risk for lower leg proprioceptive decrease (240 Hz) through the NSLBP exacerbation.

AB - Study Design: A cross-sectional, observational study. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine a specific proprioceptive control strategy during postural balance in elderly patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and non-LBP (NLBP). Summary of Background Data: Proprioceptive decline is an important risk factor for decreased balance control in elderly patients with NSLBP. The resulting reduction in proprioception in the trunk or lower legs may contribute to a reduction in postural sway. This study aims to determine the specific proprioceptive control strategy used during postural balance in elderly patients with NSLBP and NLBP and to assess whether this strategy is related to proprioceptive decline in NSLBP. Methods: Pressure displacement centers were determined in 28 elderly patients with NSLBP and 46 elderly patients with NLBP during upright stances on a balance board without the benefit of vision. Gastrocnemius and lumbar multifidus muscle vibratory stimulations at 30, 60, and 240 Hz, respectively, were applied to evaluate the relative contributions of the different proprioceptive signals (relative proprioceptive weighting ratio, RPW) used in postural control. Results: Compared to elderly patients with NLBP, those with NSLBP had a lower RPW at 240Hz and significantly higher RPW at 30Hz. A logistic regression analysis showed that RPW at 240 Hz was independently associated with NSLBP after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusion: Elderly patients with NSLBP decreased their reliance on ankle strategy (RPW at 240 Hz) and hip strategy (RPW at 30Hz) proprioceptive signals during balance control. The inability to control hip and ankle strategies indicates a deficit of postural control and is hypothesized to result from proprioceptive impairment. Moreover, elderly patients with NSLBP are at higher risk for lower leg proprioceptive decrease (240 Hz) through the NSLBP exacerbation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061962791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061962791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002817

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002817

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1704

EP - 1709

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 24

ER -