TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective study on the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma registered for living donor liver transplantation
T2 - How long can they wait?
AU - Mizuno, Shugo
AU - Yokoi, Hajime
AU - Shiraki, Katsuya
AU - Usui, Masanobu
AU - Sakurai, Hiroyuki
AU - Tabata, Masami
AU - Sugimoto, Kazushi
AU - Takei, Yoshiyuki
AU - Yamakado, Koichiro
AU - Takeda, Kan
AU - Uemoto, Shinji
AU - Isaji, Shuji
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Background: In countries where cadaveric organ donation is limited, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been reserved as a rescue option for the patients with uncontrollable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: Between March 2002 and June 2006, 56 patients with HCC had been registered as a LDLT candidate after HCC cannot be treated conventionally. We compared the survival rates between the patients who underwent LDLT (living donor liver transplantation group: LT, n=29) and those who did not undergo LDLT (no transplantation group: NLT, n=27). In the NLT group, we examined the periods suitable for resection or ablation (from first diagnosis to registration), suitable for LDLT, and unsuitable for LDLT. Results: Even among the patients who did not meet Milan criteria (LT: n=10, NLT: n=16), 1-and 3-year survival rates were significantly higher in the LT group than in the NLT group: 90.0% and 60.0% vs. 75.0% and 8.3%, respectively (P=0.046). In the NLT group, the median periods suitable for resection or ablation, suitable for LDLT, and unsuitable for LDLT were 28.9, 12.2, and 3.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: LDLT is acceptable for the patients who gave up the conventional treatment. Approximately 12 months remain for the LDLT candidates with HCC to decide to undergo it.
AB - Background: In countries where cadaveric organ donation is limited, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been reserved as a rescue option for the patients with uncontrollable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: Between March 2002 and June 2006, 56 patients with HCC had been registered as a LDLT candidate after HCC cannot be treated conventionally. We compared the survival rates between the patients who underwent LDLT (living donor liver transplantation group: LT, n=29) and those who did not undergo LDLT (no transplantation group: NLT, n=27). In the NLT group, we examined the periods suitable for resection or ablation (from first diagnosis to registration), suitable for LDLT, and unsuitable for LDLT. Results: Even among the patients who did not meet Milan criteria (LT: n=10, NLT: n=16), 1-and 3-year survival rates were significantly higher in the LT group than in the NLT group: 90.0% and 60.0% vs. 75.0% and 8.3%, respectively (P=0.046). In the NLT group, the median periods suitable for resection or ablation, suitable for LDLT, and unsuitable for LDLT were 28.9, 12.2, and 3.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: LDLT is acceptable for the patients who gave up the conventional treatment. Approximately 12 months remain for the LDLT candidates with HCC to decide to undergo it.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949899025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949899025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cd4ae9
DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cd4ae9
M3 - Article
C2 - 20048691
AN - SCOPUS:77949899025
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 89
SP - 650
EP - 654
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 6
ER -