TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
T2 - Is it rocket science?
AU - Hori, Tomohide
AU - Oike, Fumitaka
AU - Furuyama, Hiroaki
AU - Machimoto, Takafumi
AU - Kadokawa, Yoshio
AU - Hata, Toshiyuki
AU - Kato, Shigeru
AU - Yasukawa, Daiki
AU - Aisu, Yuki
AU - Sasaki, Maho
AU - Kimura, Yusuke
AU - Takamatsu, Yuichiro
AU - Naito, Masato
AU - Nakauchi, Masaya
AU - Tanaka, Takahiro
AU - Gunji, Daigo
AU - Nakamura, Kiyokuni
AU - Sato, Kiyoko
AU - Mizuno, Masahiro
AU - Iida, Taku
AU - Yagi, Shintaro
AU - Uemoto, Shinji
AU - Yoshimura, Tsunehiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/12/21
Y1 - 2016/12/21
N2 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) does not require advanced techniques, and its performance has therefore rapidly spread worldwide. However, the rate of biliary injuries has not decreased. The concept of the critical view of safety (CVS) was first documented two decades ago. Unexpected injuries are principally due to misidentification of human factors. The surgeon's assumption is a major cause of misidentification, and a high level of experience alone is not sufficient for successful LC. We herein describe tips and pitfalls of LC in detail and discuss various technical considerations. Finally, based on a review of important papers and our own experience, we summarize the following mandatory protocol for safe LC: (1) consideration that a high level of experience alone is not enough; (2) recognition of the plateau involving the common hepatic duct and hepatic hilum; (3) blunt dissection until CVS exposure; (4) Calot's triangle clearance in the overhead view; (5) Calot's triangle clearance in the view from underneath; (6) dissection of the posterior right side of Calot's triangle; (7) removal of the gallbladder body; and (8) positive CVS exposure. We believe that adherence to this protocol will ensure successful and beneficial LC worldwide, even in patients with inflammatory changes and rare anatomies.
AB - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) does not require advanced techniques, and its performance has therefore rapidly spread worldwide. However, the rate of biliary injuries has not decreased. The concept of the critical view of safety (CVS) was first documented two decades ago. Unexpected injuries are principally due to misidentification of human factors. The surgeon's assumption is a major cause of misidentification, and a high level of experience alone is not sufficient for successful LC. We herein describe tips and pitfalls of LC in detail and discuss various technical considerations. Finally, based on a review of important papers and our own experience, we summarize the following mandatory protocol for safe LC: (1) consideration that a high level of experience alone is not enough; (2) recognition of the plateau involving the common hepatic duct and hepatic hilum; (3) blunt dissection until CVS exposure; (4) Calot's triangle clearance in the overhead view; (5) Calot's triangle clearance in the view from underneath; (6) dissection of the posterior right side of Calot's triangle; (7) removal of the gallbladder body; and (8) positive CVS exposure. We believe that adherence to this protocol will ensure successful and beneficial LC worldwide, even in patients with inflammatory changes and rare anatomies.
KW - Biliary injury
KW - Critical view of safety
KW - Gallbladder
KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
KW - Protocol
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008223812
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85008223812#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287
DO - 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10287
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28058010
AN - SCOPUS:85008223812
SN - 1007-9327
VL - 22
SP - 10287
EP - 10303
JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 47
ER -