TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life improvement after radiotherapy for bone metastases assessed using real-world data
T2 - a secondary analysis of a Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study
AU - Utsumi, Nobuko
AU - Saito, Tetsuo
AU - Shikama, Naoto
AU - Takahashi, Takeo
AU - Harada, Hideyuki
AU - Nakamura, Naoki
AU - Ueno, Shuichi
AU - Notsu, Akifumi
AU - Shirato, Hiroki
AU - Yamada, Kazunari
AU - Uezono, Haruka
AU - Koide, Yutaro
AU - Kubota, Hikaru
AU - Yamazaki, Takuya
AU - Ito, Kei
AU - Heianna, Joichi
AU - Okada, Yukinori
AU - Tonari, Ayako
AU - Katoh, Norio
AU - Wada, Hitoshi
AU - Ejima, Yasuo
AU - Yoshida, Kayo
AU - Kosugi, Takashi
AU - Takahashi, Shigeo
AU - Komiyama, Takafumi
AU - Uchida, Nobue
AU - Miwa, Misako
AU - Watanabe, Miho
AU - Nagakura, Hisayasu
AU - Ikeda, Hiroko
AU - Asakawa, Isao
AU - Shigematsu, Naoyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Objective: Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor -, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models. Results: QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22. Conclusion: Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.
AB - Objective: Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor -, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models. Results: QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22. Conclusion: Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.
KW - cohort study
KW - metastases
KW - palliative treatment
KW - quality of life
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217840606
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217840606#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/jjco/hyae150
DO - 10.1093/jjco/hyae150
M3 - Article
C2 - 39479804
AN - SCOPUS:85217840606
SN - 0368-2811
VL - 55
SP - 140
EP - 147
JO - Japanese journal of clinical oncology
JF - Japanese journal of clinical oncology
IS - 2
ER -