TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiographic evaluation of patellofemoral alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty
T2 - A comparative study with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty
AU - Nagai, Katsuya
AU - Niki, Yasuo
AU - Kobayashi, Shu
AU - Harato, Kengo
AU - Nagura, Takeo
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), in which femoral component is placed 3–5° of internal rotation relative to mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA, may have a potential risk of patellofemoral malalignment. This study aimed to assess patellofemoral alignment and compare the data between KA-TKA and MA-TKA, and the relationship with patellofemoral radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes. Methods: Among patients who underwent TKA in 2015 and 2016 in our institute, 28 KA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component were retrospectively assessed for patellofemoral alignment, and 28 MA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component served as controls. A year postoperatively, patellar tilt and shift at 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion were measured on Merchant views and compared between the two TKAs. Implant positioning in each patient was assessed based on preoperative CT images and correlations of femoral component positioning with patellar tilt/shift were assessed. Results: Patellar shift at 30° flexion was significantly greater in KA-TKA than in MA-TKA (p = 0.04), whereas patellar tilt angle was comparable between the two TKAs. No statistical correlation was evident between femoral component positioning and patellar shift/tilt, regardless of knee flexion angle in the two TKAs. Knee Society Score 2011 at 1 year follow-up was comparable in all subcategories between the two TKAs. Conclusion: Radiographic analysis of KA-TKA revealed lateral shift of the patella at 30° knee flexion at 1 year postoperatively, however patients with patellar shift were asymptomatic. Further long-term observation is required to examine the impact of KA-TKA on the patellofemoral complication.
AB - Background: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), in which femoral component is placed 3–5° of internal rotation relative to mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA, may have a potential risk of patellofemoral malalignment. This study aimed to assess patellofemoral alignment and compare the data between KA-TKA and MA-TKA, and the relationship with patellofemoral radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes. Methods: Among patients who underwent TKA in 2015 and 2016 in our institute, 28 KA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component were retrospectively assessed for patellofemoral alignment, and 28 MA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component served as controls. A year postoperatively, patellar tilt and shift at 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion were measured on Merchant views and compared between the two TKAs. Implant positioning in each patient was assessed based on preoperative CT images and correlations of femoral component positioning with patellar tilt/shift were assessed. Results: Patellar shift at 30° flexion was significantly greater in KA-TKA than in MA-TKA (p = 0.04), whereas patellar tilt angle was comparable between the two TKAs. No statistical correlation was evident between femoral component positioning and patellar shift/tilt, regardless of knee flexion angle in the two TKAs. Knee Society Score 2011 at 1 year follow-up was comparable in all subcategories between the two TKAs. Conclusion: Radiographic analysis of KA-TKA revealed lateral shift of the patella at 30° knee flexion at 1 year postoperatively, however patients with patellar shift were asymptomatic. Further long-term observation is required to examine the impact of KA-TKA on the patellofemoral complication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095743405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095743405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2020.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2020.09.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 33183938
AN - SCOPUS:85095743405
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 26
SP - 1043
EP - 1050
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 6
ER -