TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Comparison Between Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Stent
T2 - Multimodality Imaging Through 3 Years
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Honda, Yasuhiro
AU - Asano, Taku
AU - Shiomi, Hiroki
AU - Kozuma, Ken
AU - Ozaki, Yukio
AU - Namiki, Atsuo
AU - Yasuda, Satoshi
AU - Ueno, Takafumi
AU - Ando, Kenji
AU - Furuya, Jungo
AU - Hanaoka, Keiichi Igarashi
AU - Tanabe, Kengo
AU - Okada, Kozo
AU - Kitahara, Hideki
AU - Ono, Masafumi
AU - Kusano, Hajime
AU - Rapoza, Richard
AU - Simonton, Charles
AU - Popma, Jeffrey J.
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Fitzgerald, Peter J.
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
AU - Kimura, Takeshi
N1 - Funding Information:
The sponsor (Abbott Vascular) was involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of this report. The corresponding author had full access to the analyzed data in the study and accepts full responsibility for the integrity of the study and the decision to submit for publication. Drs. Onuma and Serruys are members of the advisory board of Abbott Vascular. Dr. Stone is chairman of the advisory board of Abbott Vascular; and is a consultant to Reva. Dr. Popma has received grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular. Drs. Namiki, Ueno, Ando, Igarashi, Kozuma, Tanabe, and Kimura have received personal fees for advisory agreements with Abbott Vascular Japan. Drs. Kusano, Rapoza, and Simonton are employees of Abbott Vascular. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/1/13
Y1 - 2020/1/13
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the vascular responses and fates of the scaffold after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation using multimodality imaging. Background: Serial comprehensive image assessments after BVS implantation in the context of a randomized trial have not yet been reported. Methods: In the ABSORB Japan trial, 400 patients were randomized to a BVS (n = 266) or a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (n = 134). Through 3 years, patients underwent serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results: Luminal dimension at 3 years was consistently smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (mean angiographic minimal luminal diameter 2.04 ± 0.63 mm vs. 2.40 ± 0.56 mm, mean difference −0.37 mm [95% confidence interval: −0.50 to −0.24 mm]; p < 0.001), mainly because of smaller device area (6.13 ± 2.03 mm2 vs. 7.15 ± 2.16 mm2, mean difference −1.04 mm2 [95% confidence interval: −1.66 to −0.42 mm2]; p < 0.001), and larger neointimal area (2.10 ± 0.61 mm2 vs. 1.86 ± 0.64 mm2, mean difference 0.24 mm2 [95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.43 mm2]; p = 0.01) by OCT. BVS-treated vessels did not show previously reported favorable vessel responses, such as positive vessel remodeling, late luminal enlargement, and restoration of vasomotion, although the OCT-based healing score was on average zero (interquartile range: 0.00 to 0.00). At 3 years, intraluminal scaffold dismantling (ISD) was observed in 14% of BVS. On serial OCT, ISD was observed in 6 lesions at 2 years, where the struts had been fully apposed at post-procedure, while ISD was observed in 12 lesions at 3 years, where 8 lesions were free from ISD on 2-year OCT. In 5 cases of very late scaffold thrombosis, strut discontinuities were detected in all 4 cases with available OCT immediately before reintervention. Conclusions: In this multimodality serial imaging study, luminal dimension at 3 years was smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. ISD, suspected to be one of the mechanisms of very late BVS thrombosis, was observed in a substantial proportion of cases at 3 years, which developed between post-procedure and 2 years and even beyond 2 years.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the vascular responses and fates of the scaffold after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation using multimodality imaging. Background: Serial comprehensive image assessments after BVS implantation in the context of a randomized trial have not yet been reported. Methods: In the ABSORB Japan trial, 400 patients were randomized to a BVS (n = 266) or a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (n = 134). Through 3 years, patients underwent serial angiography and intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results: Luminal dimension at 3 years was consistently smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (mean angiographic minimal luminal diameter 2.04 ± 0.63 mm vs. 2.40 ± 0.56 mm, mean difference −0.37 mm [95% confidence interval: −0.50 to −0.24 mm]; p < 0.001), mainly because of smaller device area (6.13 ± 2.03 mm2 vs. 7.15 ± 2.16 mm2, mean difference −1.04 mm2 [95% confidence interval: −1.66 to −0.42 mm2]; p < 0.001), and larger neointimal area (2.10 ± 0.61 mm2 vs. 1.86 ± 0.64 mm2, mean difference 0.24 mm2 [95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.43 mm2]; p = 0.01) by OCT. BVS-treated vessels did not show previously reported favorable vessel responses, such as positive vessel remodeling, late luminal enlargement, and restoration of vasomotion, although the OCT-based healing score was on average zero (interquartile range: 0.00 to 0.00). At 3 years, intraluminal scaffold dismantling (ISD) was observed in 14% of BVS. On serial OCT, ISD was observed in 6 lesions at 2 years, where the struts had been fully apposed at post-procedure, while ISD was observed in 12 lesions at 3 years, where 8 lesions were free from ISD on 2-year OCT. In 5 cases of very late scaffold thrombosis, strut discontinuities were detected in all 4 cases with available OCT immediately before reintervention. Conclusions: In this multimodality serial imaging study, luminal dimension at 3 years was smaller with the BVS than with the cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. ISD, suspected to be one of the mechanisms of very late BVS thrombosis, was observed in a substantial proportion of cases at 3 years, which developed between post-procedure and 2 years and even beyond 2 years.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076835752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076835752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.047
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 31918929
AN - SCOPUS:85076835752
VL - 13
SP - 116
EP - 127
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1936-8798
IS - 1
ER -