Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka

Go Wakabayashi, Daniel Cherqui, David A. Geller, Joseph F. Buell, Hironori Kaneko, Ho Seong Han, Horacio Asbun, Nicholas O'Rourke, Minoru Tanabe, Alan J. Koffron, Allan Tsung, Olivier Soubrane, Marcel Autran Machado, Brice Gayet, Roberto I. Troisi, Patrick Pessaux, Ronald M. Van Dam, Olivier Scatton, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Giulio BelliChoon Hyuck David Kwon, Bjørn Edwin, Gi Hong Choi, Luca Antonio Aldrighetti, Xiujun Cai, Sean Cleary, Kuo Hsin Chen, Michael R. Schön, Atsushi Sugioka, Chung Ngai Tang, Paulo Herman, Juan Pekolj, Xiao Ping Chen, Ibrahim Dagher, William Jarnagin, Masakazu Yamamoto, Russell Strong, Palepu Jagannath, Chung Mau Lo, Pierre Alain Clavien, Norihiro Kokudo, Jeffrey Barkun, Steven M. Strasberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

558 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of laparoscopy for liver surgery is increasing rapidly. The Second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resections (LLR) was held in Morioka, Japan, from October 4 to 6, 2014 to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery and to provide recommendations to aid its future development. Seventeen questions were addressed. The first 7 questions focused on outcomes that reflect the benefits and risks of LLR. These questions were addressed using the Zurich-Danish consensus conference model inwhich the literature and expert opinion were weighed by a 9-member jury, who evaluated LLR outcomes using GRADE and a list of comparators. The jury also graded LLRs by the Balliol Classification of IDEAL. The jury concluded that MINORLLRs had become standard practice (IDEAL 3) and thatMAJORliver resections were still innovative procedures in the exploration phase (IDEAL 2b). Continued cautious introduction of MAJOR LLRswas recommended. All of the evidence available for scrutiny was of LOWquality by GRADE, which prompted the recommendation for higher quality evaluative studies. The last 10 questions focused on technical questions and the recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion. Recommendations were made regarding preoperative evaluation, bleeding controls, transection methods, anatomic approaches, and equipment. Both experts and jury recognized the need for a formal structure of education for those interested in performing major laparoscopic LLR because of the steep learning curve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-629
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume261
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04-2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Wakabayashi, G., Cherqui, D., Geller, D. A., Buell, J. F., Kaneko, H., Han, H. S., Asbun, H., O'Rourke, N., Tanabe, M., Koffron, A. J., Tsung, A., Soubrane, O., Machado, M. A., Gayet, B., Troisi, R. I., Pessaux, P., Van Dam, R. M., Scatton, O., Hilal, M. A., ... Strasberg, S. M. (2015). Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka. Annals of Surgery, 261(4), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184