TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconsideration of the appropriate dissection range based on Japanese anatomical classification for resectable pancreatic head cancer in the era of multimodal treatment
AU - Nagakawa, Yuichi
AU - Nakagawa, Naoya
AU - Takishita, Chie
AU - Uyama, Ichiro
AU - Kozono, Shingo
AU - Osakabe, Hiroaki
AU - Suzuki, Kenta
AU - Nakagawa, Nobuhiko
AU - Hosokawa, Yuichi
AU - Shirota, Tomoki
AU - Honda, Masayuki
AU - Yamada, Tesshi
AU - Katsumata, Kenji
AU - Tsuchida, Akihiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/7/2
Y1 - 2021/7/2
N2 - Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are considered to already have micro-distant metastasis, because most of the recurrence patterns postoperatively are distant metastases. Multi-modal treatment dramatically improves prognosis; thus, micro-distant metastasis is considered to be controlled by chemotherapy. The survival benefit of “regional lymph node dissection” for pancreatic head cancer remains unclear. We reviewed the literature that could be helpful in determining the appropriate resection range. Regional lymph nodes with no suspected metastases on preoperative imaging may become areas treated with preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Many studies have reported that the R0 resection rate is associated with prognosis. Thus, “dissection to achieve R0 resection” is required. The recent development of high-quality computed tomography has made it possible to evaluate the extent of cancer infiltration. Therefore, it is possible to simulate the dissection range to achieve R0 resection preoperatively. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between areas of inflammatory changes and cancer infiltration during resection. Even if the “dissec-tion to achieve R0 resection” range is simulated based on the computed tomography evaluation, it is difficult to identify the range intraoperatively. It is necessary to be aware of anatomical landmarks to determine the appropriate dissection range during surgery.
AB - Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are considered to already have micro-distant metastasis, because most of the recurrence patterns postoperatively are distant metastases. Multi-modal treatment dramatically improves prognosis; thus, micro-distant metastasis is considered to be controlled by chemotherapy. The survival benefit of “regional lymph node dissection” for pancreatic head cancer remains unclear. We reviewed the literature that could be helpful in determining the appropriate resection range. Regional lymph nodes with no suspected metastases on preoperative imaging may become areas treated with preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Many studies have reported that the R0 resection rate is associated with prognosis. Thus, “dissection to achieve R0 resection” is required. The recent development of high-quality computed tomography has made it possible to evaluate the extent of cancer infiltration. Therefore, it is possible to simulate the dissection range to achieve R0 resection preoperatively. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between areas of inflammatory changes and cancer infiltration during resection. Even if the “dissec-tion to achieve R0 resection” range is simulated based on the computed tomography evaluation, it is difficult to identify the range intraoperatively. It is necessary to be aware of anatomical landmarks to determine the appropriate dissection range during surgery.
KW - Adjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Lymph node dissection
KW - Mesopancreas
KW - Nerve and fibrous tissues
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - Pancreaticoduodenectomy
KW - R0 resection
KW - Superior mesenteric artery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110306970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110306970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13143605
DO - 10.3390/cancers13143605
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85110306970
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 14
M1 - 3605
ER -