TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between force and velocity in isotonic knee extension exercise
T2 - A preliminary study for the selection of the maximum and minimum load
AU - Sugiura, Yoshito
AU - Hatanaka, Yasuhiko
AU - Arai, Tomoaki
AU - Sakurai, Hiroaki
AU - Kanada, Yoshikiyo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Society of Physical Therapy Science (Rigaku Ryoho Kagakugakkai). All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/24
Y1 - 2015/6/24
N2 - [Purpose] To demonstrate the relationship between force and velocity in isotonic contraction of knee extension, and with estimation of isometric peak torque, investigate the appropriate load for physical safety in human measurements. [Subjects] Six healthy males in their 20s and 30s. [Methods] Images captured by a high-speed video camera were converted to sequential frames using video editing software. Using the angle measurement tools of image measurement software, angular velocities, and knee angles were determined, and the angular velocities were compared among minimum loads of 20, 30, and 40% 1RM, and maximum loads of 100, 130, 150 and 160% 1RM. [Results] There were no significant differences among the three minimum loads, but there was a significant difference between the maximum loads of 150 and 160% 1RM. [Conclusion] We consider that a minimum load of 40% 1RM and a maximum load of 150% 1RM are appropriate loads.
AB - [Purpose] To demonstrate the relationship between force and velocity in isotonic contraction of knee extension, and with estimation of isometric peak torque, investigate the appropriate load for physical safety in human measurements. [Subjects] Six healthy males in their 20s and 30s. [Methods] Images captured by a high-speed video camera were converted to sequential frames using video editing software. Using the angle measurement tools of image measurement software, angular velocities, and knee angles were determined, and the angular velocities were compared among minimum loads of 20, 30, and 40% 1RM, and maximum loads of 100, 130, 150 and 160% 1RM. [Results] There were no significant differences among the three minimum loads, but there was a significant difference between the maximum loads of 150 and 160% 1RM. [Conclusion] We consider that a minimum load of 40% 1RM and a maximum load of 150% 1RM are appropriate loads.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933045085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933045085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1589/rika.30.225
DO - 10.1589/rika.30.225
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84933045085
SN - 1341-1667
VL - 30
SP - 225
EP - 228
JO - Rigakuryoho Kagaku
JF - Rigakuryoho Kagaku
IS - 2
ER -