TY - JOUR
T1 - Reverse encoding distortion correction for diffusion-weighted MRI
T2 - Efficacy for improving image quality and ADC evaluation for differentiating malignant from benign areas in suspected prostatic cancer patients
AU - Ueda, Takahiro
AU - Ohno, Yoshiharu
AU - Shinohara, Maiko
AU - Yamamoto, Kaori
AU - Ikedo, Masato
AU - Yui, Masao
AU - Yoshikawa, Takeshi
AU - Takenaka, Daisuke
AU - Ishida, Sayuri
AU - Furuta, Minami
AU - Matsuyama, Takahiro
AU - Nagata, Hiroyuki
AU - Ikeda, Hirotaka
AU - Ozawa, Yoshiyuki
AU - Toyama, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of reverse encoding distortion correction (RDC) on ADC measurement and its efficacy for improving image quality and diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign prostatic areas on prostatic DWI. Methods: Forty suspected prostatic cancer patients underwent DWI with or without RDC (i.e. RDC DWI or DWI) using a 3 T MR system as well as pathological examinations. The pathological examination results indicated 86 areas were malignant while 86 out of 394 areas were computationally selected as benign. SNR for benign areas and muscle and ADCs for malignant and benign areas were determined by ROI measurements on each DWI. Moreover, overall image quality was assessed with a 5-point visual scoring system on each DWI. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test was performed to compare SNR and overall image quality for DWIs. ROC analysis was then used to compare the diagnostic performance, and sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and accuracy (AC) of ADC were compared between two DWI by means of McNemar's test. Results: SNR and overall image quality of RDC DWI showed significant improvements when compared with those of DWI (p < 0.05). Areas under the curve (AUC), SP and AC of DWI RDC DWI (AUC: 0.85, SP: 72.1%, AC: 79.1%) were significantly better than those of DWI (AUC: 0.79, p = 0.008; SP: 64%, p = 0.02; AC: 74.4%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: RDC technique has the potential to improve image quality and ability to differentiate malignant from benign prostatic areas on DWIs of suspected prostatic cancer patients.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of reverse encoding distortion correction (RDC) on ADC measurement and its efficacy for improving image quality and diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign prostatic areas on prostatic DWI. Methods: Forty suspected prostatic cancer patients underwent DWI with or without RDC (i.e. RDC DWI or DWI) using a 3 T MR system as well as pathological examinations. The pathological examination results indicated 86 areas were malignant while 86 out of 394 areas were computationally selected as benign. SNR for benign areas and muscle and ADCs for malignant and benign areas were determined by ROI measurements on each DWI. Moreover, overall image quality was assessed with a 5-point visual scoring system on each DWI. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test was performed to compare SNR and overall image quality for DWIs. ROC analysis was then used to compare the diagnostic performance, and sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and accuracy (AC) of ADC were compared between two DWI by means of McNemar's test. Results: SNR and overall image quality of RDC DWI showed significant improvements when compared with those of DWI (p < 0.05). Areas under the curve (AUC), SP and AC of DWI RDC DWI (AUC: 0.85, SP: 72.1%, AC: 79.1%) were significantly better than those of DWI (AUC: 0.79, p = 0.008; SP: 64%, p = 0.02; AC: 74.4%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: RDC technique has the potential to improve image quality and ability to differentiate malignant from benign prostatic areas on DWIs of suspected prostatic cancer patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149734705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149734705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110764
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110764
M3 - Article
C2 - 36905716
AN - SCOPUS:85149734705
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 162
JO - European journal of radiology
JF - European journal of radiology
M1 - 110764
ER -