TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Intravenous Busulfan in Allogeneic Transplantation
T2 - A Matched-Pair Analysis
AU - Kako, Shinichi
AU - Fujiwara, Shinichiro
AU - Sato, Miki
AU - Kimura, Shun ichi
AU - Nakasone, Hideki
AU - Ohashi, Kazuteru
AU - Kawakita, Toshiro
AU - Maeda, Tetsuo
AU - Morishita, Takanobu
AU - Suzuki, Ritsuro
AU - Fukuda, Takahiro
AU - Ichinohe, Tatsuo
AU - Kurata, Mio
AU - Atsuta, Yoshiko
AU - Kanda, Yoshinobu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Compared with 4-times-daily infusion of intravenous busulfan (ivBU4), the safety and efficacy of once-daily infusion of ivBU (ivBU1) has not been fully clarified. We have been routinely using ivBU1 in a conditioning regimen in adult patients with myeloid malignancy who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this study, a total of 91 patients who received ivBU1 for 2 days (n = 18) or 4 days (n = 73) in our institutions were compared with 273 control patients who received ivBU4, who were matched for age, sex, performance status, disease risk, conditioning regimen, and donor type, selected from the database of the Japanese Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation using optimal matching algorithms. One-year overall survival (56.8% versus 57.1%, P =.94), disease-free survival (51.6% versus 50.8%, P =.73), relapse rate (28.5% versus 26.2%, P =.94), nonrelapse mortality (19.9% versus 23.0%, P =.71), and the incidence of graft-versus-host disease were not significantly different between the ivBU1 and ivBU4 groups. In patients who received ivBU1, neutrophil recovery was slower (median days: 22 versus 17, P =.001), and the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was lower (2.6% versus 17.4%, P =.04). In conclusion, ivBU1 can be safely administered with clinical outcomes similar to those with ivBU4.
AB - Compared with 4-times-daily infusion of intravenous busulfan (ivBU4), the safety and efficacy of once-daily infusion of ivBU (ivBU1) has not been fully clarified. We have been routinely using ivBU1 in a conditioning regimen in adult patients with myeloid malignancy who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this study, a total of 91 patients who received ivBU1 for 2 days (n = 18) or 4 days (n = 73) in our institutions were compared with 273 control patients who received ivBU4, who were matched for age, sex, performance status, disease risk, conditioning regimen, and donor type, selected from the database of the Japanese Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation using optimal matching algorithms. One-year overall survival (56.8% versus 57.1%, P =.94), disease-free survival (51.6% versus 50.8%, P =.73), relapse rate (28.5% versus 26.2%, P =.94), nonrelapse mortality (19.9% versus 23.0%, P =.71), and the incidence of graft-versus-host disease were not significantly different between the ivBU1 and ivBU4 groups. In patients who received ivBU1, neutrophil recovery was slower (median days: 22 versus 17, P =.001), and the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was lower (2.6% versus 17.4%, P =.04). In conclusion, ivBU1 can be safely administered with clinical outcomes similar to those with ivBU4.
KW - Allogeneic transplantation
KW - Four-times-daily
KW - Intravenous busulfan
KW - Matched-pair analysis
KW - Once-daily
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046852837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046852837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.015
DO - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.04.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 29680515
AN - SCOPUS:85046852837
SN - 1083-8791
VL - 24
SP - 2139
EP - 2144
JO - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
JF - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
IS - 10
ER -