TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety of Combined Division vs Separate Division of the Splenic Vein in Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy
T2 - A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Yamada, Suguru
AU - Fujii, Tsutomu
AU - Sonohara, Fuminori
AU - Kawai, Manabu
AU - Shibuya, Kazuto
AU - Matsumoto, Ippei
AU - Fukuzawa, Kengo
AU - Baba, Hideo
AU - Aoki, Takeshi
AU - Unno, Michiaki
AU - Satoi, Sohei
AU - Kishi, Yoji
AU - Hatano, Etsuro
AU - Uemura, Kenichiro
AU - Horiguchi, Akihiko
AU - Sho, Masayuki
AU - Takeda, Yutaka
AU - Shimokawa, Toshio
AU - Kodera, Yasuhiro
AU - Yamaue, Hiroki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Importance: In distal pancreatectomy (DP), the splenic vein is isolated from the pancreatic parenchyma prior to being ligated and divided to prevent intra-abdominal hemorrhage from the splenic vein stump with pancreatic fistula (PF). Conversely, dissecting the splenic vein with the pancreatic parenchyma is easy and time-saving. Objective: To establish the safety of combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized phase 3 trial. All results were analyzed using the modified intent-to-treat set. Patients undergoing DP for pancreatic body and tail tumors were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned between August 10, 2016, and July 30, 2019. Interventions: Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) to either separate division of the splenic vein or combined division of the splenic vein. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the incidence of grade B/C PF, and the incidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage was included as one of the secondary end points. Results: A total of 318 patients were randomly assigned, and 2 patients were excluded as ineligible. Of the 316 remaining patients, 150 (50.3%) were male. The modified intent-to-treat population constituted 159 patients (50.3%) in the separate division group and 157 patients (49.7%) in the combined division group. In the modified intent-to-treat set, the proportion of grade B/C PF in the separate division group was 27.1% (42 of 155) vs 28.6% (44 of 154) in the combined division group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.108; 95% CI, 0.847-1.225; P =.047), demonstrating noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein against separate division. The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage in the 2 groups was identical at 1.3%. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrated noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein regarding safety. Thus, isolating the splenic vein from the pancreatic parenchyma is deemed unnecessary. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02871804.
AB - Importance: In distal pancreatectomy (DP), the splenic vein is isolated from the pancreatic parenchyma prior to being ligated and divided to prevent intra-abdominal hemorrhage from the splenic vein stump with pancreatic fistula (PF). Conversely, dissecting the splenic vein with the pancreatic parenchyma is easy and time-saving. Objective: To establish the safety of combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized phase 3 trial. All results were analyzed using the modified intent-to-treat set. Patients undergoing DP for pancreatic body and tail tumors were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned between August 10, 2016, and July 30, 2019. Interventions: Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) to either separate division of the splenic vein or combined division of the splenic vein. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the incidence of grade B/C PF, and the incidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage was included as one of the secondary end points. Results: A total of 318 patients were randomly assigned, and 2 patients were excluded as ineligible. Of the 316 remaining patients, 150 (50.3%) were male. The modified intent-to-treat population constituted 159 patients (50.3%) in the separate division group and 157 patients (49.7%) in the combined division group. In the modified intent-to-treat set, the proportion of grade B/C PF in the separate division group was 27.1% (42 of 155) vs 28.6% (44 of 154) in the combined division group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.108; 95% CI, 0.847-1.225; P =.047), demonstrating noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein against separate division. The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage in the 2 groups was identical at 1.3%. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrated noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein regarding safety. Thus, isolating the splenic vein from the pancreatic parenchyma is deemed unnecessary. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02871804.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102141570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102141570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0108
DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0108
M3 - Article
C2 - 33656542
AN - SCOPUS:85102141570
SN - 2168-6254
VL - 156
SP - 418
EP - 428
JO - JAMA Surgery
JF - JAMA Surgery
IS - 5
ER -