TY - JOUR
T1 - SAGES climate survey
T2 - results and strategic planning for our future
AU - WRS Task Force
AU - Telem, Dana A.
AU - Qureshi, Alia
AU - Edwards, Michael
AU - Jones, Daniel B.
AU - Abdelnaby, Abier
AU - Altieri, Maria S.
AU - Cahalane, Michael
AU - Chung, Jimmy
AU - Curet, Myriam
AU - Daly, Shaun
AU - Dimick, Justin B.
AU - Alban, Evelyn Dorado
AU - Goldberg, Ross
AU - Do, Caitlin Halbert
AU - usain, Farah H.
AU - Jackson, Hope
AU - Johnson, Shaneeta
AU - Keune, Jason
AU - Klingensmith, Mary
AU - Lidor, Anne
AU - Lin, Henry
AU - Matthews, Brent
AU - Paige, John
AU - Pandya, Yagnik
AU - Puri, Ruchir
AU - Reid, K. Marie
AU - Salles, Arghavan
AU - Shim, Joon
AU - Soriano, Ian
AU - Stain, Steven
AU - Sylla, Patricia
AU - Vithiananthan, Sivamainthan
AU - Watanabe, Yusuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background: While SAGES prides itself on diversity and inclusivity, we also recognize that as an organization we are not impervious to blind spots impacting equity within the membership. To address this, the We R Sages task force was formed to identify the barriers and facilitators to creating a diverse organization and develop a strategic plan for the implementation of programing and opportunities that promote diversity and inclusivity within our membership. As the first step in the process, a survey was administered to gauge the current organizational climate. Methods: In September of 2017, a validated climate survey was administered to 704 SAGES committee members via SurveyMonkey®. Climate was assessed on: overall SAGES experience, consideration of leaving the organization, mentorship within the organization, resources and opportunities within the organization, and attitudes and experiences within the organization. Additional free text responses were encouraged to generate qualitative themes. Results: The survey response rate was 52.1% (n = 367). Respondent self-identified demographics were: male (73%), white (63%), heterosexual (95.5%), and non-disabled (98%). Average overall satisfaction was 8.1/10. 12.5% of respondents had considered leaving the organization and 74.4% had not identified a formal mentor within the organization. Average agreement with equitable distribution of resources and opportunities was 5.8/10. 93.6% of respondents had not experienced bias within the organization. Conclusion: Overall SAGES has a very positive climate; however, several key issues were identified from the quantitative survey as well as the free text responses. Strategic planning to address issues of membership recruitment, committee engagement, advancement transparency, diversity awareness, leadership development, and formal mentorship are being implemented.
AB - Background: While SAGES prides itself on diversity and inclusivity, we also recognize that as an organization we are not impervious to blind spots impacting equity within the membership. To address this, the We R Sages task force was formed to identify the barriers and facilitators to creating a diverse organization and develop a strategic plan for the implementation of programing and opportunities that promote diversity and inclusivity within our membership. As the first step in the process, a survey was administered to gauge the current organizational climate. Methods: In September of 2017, a validated climate survey was administered to 704 SAGES committee members via SurveyMonkey®. Climate was assessed on: overall SAGES experience, consideration of leaving the organization, mentorship within the organization, resources and opportunities within the organization, and attitudes and experiences within the organization. Additional free text responses were encouraged to generate qualitative themes. Results: The survey response rate was 52.1% (n = 367). Respondent self-identified demographics were: male (73%), white (63%), heterosexual (95.5%), and non-disabled (98%). Average overall satisfaction was 8.1/10. 12.5% of respondents had considered leaving the organization and 74.4% had not identified a formal mentor within the organization. Average agreement with equitable distribution of resources and opportunities was 5.8/10. 93.6% of respondents had not experienced bias within the organization. Conclusion: Overall SAGES has a very positive climate; however, several key issues were identified from the quantitative survey as well as the free text responses. Strategic planning to address issues of membership recruitment, committee engagement, advancement transparency, diversity awareness, leadership development, and formal mentorship are being implemented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044614619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044614619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-018-6149-5
DO - 10.1007/s00464-018-6149-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 29602993
AN - SCOPUS:85044614619
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 32
SP - 4105
EP - 4110
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
IS - 10
ER -