Selecting optimal immunotherapy based on inflammation in stage IV PD-L1 ≥50% gene mutation-negative non-small cell lung cancer: pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy

  • Yusuke Kunimatsu
  • , Naoya Nishioka
  • , Tadaaki Yamada
  • , Hayato Kawachi
  • , Motohiro Tamiya
  • , Yoshiki Negi
  • , Yasuhiro Goto
  • , Akira Nakao
  • , Shinsuke Shiotsu
  • , Keiko Tanimura
  • , Takayuki Takeda
  • , Asuka Okada
  • , Taishi Harada
  • , Koji Date
  • , Yusuke Chihara
  • , Isao Hasegawa
  • , Nobuyo Tamiya
  • , Masaki Ishida
  • , Takashi Kijima
  • , Koichi Takayama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation may reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% and without driver gene mutations, both immunotherapy monotherapy and combination chemoimmunotherapy are considered standard treatment options; however, it remains unclear which treatment is more appropriate depending on the degree of inflammation. This study investigated the impact of inflammation on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 Japanese institutions who received pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment between March 2017 and October 2021. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was used as an inflammation marker, with a cutoff value of 1,444 based on previous data. Patients were classified into high (SII ≥1,444) and low (SII <1,444) inflammation groups. Results: This study included 347 patients with advanced NSCLC: 212 (61.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 135 (38.9%) in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group. In the high inflammation population, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the pembrolizumab and combination chemoimmunotherapy groups. In the low inflammation population, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group compared to the pembrolizumab group [median PFS: 8.8 vs. 16.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) =0.69, P=0.04; median OS: 29.4 vs. not reached (NR), HR =0.55, P=0.007]. Conclusions: In patients with advanced, driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), and low systemic inflammation, combination chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4733-4745
Number of pages13
JournalTranslational Lung Cancer Research
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30-11-2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selecting optimal immunotherapy based on inflammation in stage IV PD-L1 ≥50% gene mutation-negative non-small cell lung cancer: pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this