TY - JOUR
T1 - Serum soluble Fas level determines clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP and R-CHOP
AU - Hara, Takeshi
AU - Tsurumi, Hisashi
AU - Goto, Naoe
AU - Kanemura, Nobuhiro
AU - Yoshikawa, Takeshi
AU - Kasahara, Senji
AU - Yamada, Toshiki
AU - Sawada, Michio
AU - Goto, Hideko
AU - Fukuno, Kenji
AU - Kitagawa, Jun Ichi
AU - Yasuda, Ichiro
AU - Katsumura, Naoki
AU - Takemura, Masao
AU - Takahashi, Takeshi
AU - Takami, Tsuyoshi
AU - Moriwaki, Hisataka
PY - 2009/10
Y1 - 2009/10
N2 - Introduction: We previously reported that serum concentrations of soluble Fas (sFas) predict the clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after treatment with CHOP but without rituximab (R). Here, we investigated whether the role of sFas as a prognostic factor remains valid in the R-CHOP era. Patients: We treated 132 patients with DLBCL between October 1995 and September 2002 (group A: without rituximab), and 75 between December 2002 and March 2007 (group B: with rituximab). The patients received eight cycles of CHOP or THP (tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin)-COP before September 2002, and R-CHOP or R-THP-COP after October 2002. The distribution of patients according to the International Prognostic Index did not significantly differ between the groups. Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with sFas levels of ≥3.0 and <3.0 ng/ml in group A were 19.8 and 61.9% (P < 0.0001), whereas the 3-year OS rates in group B were 54.7 and 92.2% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis using the proportional hazards model revealed that sFas most significantly correlated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Serum sFas is thus a useful tool for selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for DLBCL.
AB - Introduction: We previously reported that serum concentrations of soluble Fas (sFas) predict the clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after treatment with CHOP but without rituximab (R). Here, we investigated whether the role of sFas as a prognostic factor remains valid in the R-CHOP era. Patients: We treated 132 patients with DLBCL between October 1995 and September 2002 (group A: without rituximab), and 75 between December 2002 and March 2007 (group B: with rituximab). The patients received eight cycles of CHOP or THP (tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin)-COP before September 2002, and R-CHOP or R-THP-COP after October 2002. The distribution of patients according to the International Prognostic Index did not significantly differ between the groups. Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with sFas levels of ≥3.0 and <3.0 ng/ml in group A were 19.8 and 61.9% (P < 0.0001), whereas the 3-year OS rates in group B were 54.7 and 92.2% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis using the proportional hazards model revealed that sFas most significantly correlated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Serum sFas is thus a useful tool for selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for DLBCL.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69049104100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69049104100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00432-009-0586-4
DO - 10.1007/s00432-009-0586-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 19381687
AN - SCOPUS:69049104100
SN - 0171-5216
VL - 135
SP - 1421
EP - 1428
JO - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
IS - 10
ER -