Soluble PD-L1 Expression in Circulation as a Predictive Marker for Recurrence and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer: Direct Comparison of the Clinical Burden Between Tissue and Serum PD-L1 Expression

  • Tsunehiko Shigemori
  • , Yuji Toiyama
  • , Yoshinaga Okugawa
  • , Akira Yamamoto
  • , Chengzeng Yin
  • , Aya Narumi
  • , Takashi Ichikawa
  • , Shozo Ide
  • , Tadanobu Shimura
  • , Hiroyuki Fujikawa
  • , Hiromi Yasuda
  • , Junichiro Hiro
  • , Shigeyuki Yoshiyama
  • , Masaki Ohi
  • , Toshimitsu Araki
  • , Masato Kusunoki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study assessed programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in primary tissues and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) concentration in matched preoperative serum in gastric cancer (GC) patients to perform direct comparison between tissue and serum PD-L1 expression and to clarify the prognostic implication in GC. Methods: The study enrolled 180 GC patients who underwent surgery for GC at the authors’ institution. The study evaluated tissue PD-L1 expression using immunohistochemistry and quantified sPD-L1 concentration in preoperative serum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in GC patients. Results: The findings showed that PD-L1 was overexpressed in GC tissues compared with normal mucosa. Tissue PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in the GC patients with advanced T stage, presence of lympho-vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal metastasis. Furthermore, elevated tissue PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Serum sPD-L1 was significantly higher in the GC patients than in the healthy volunteers. Although serum sPD-L1 was not correlated with any clinicopathologic factors, the patients with high serum sPD-L1 showed poorer OS and DFS than those with low sPD-L1. Multivariate analyses showed that both elevated tissue PD-L1 and serum sPD-L1 were independent prognostic factors for poor OS [tissue PD-L1: hazard ratio (HR), 4.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43–12.8; P = 0.0094 vs. serum sPD-L1: HR, 11.2; 95% CI, 3.44–36.7; P = 0.0001] and poor DFS (tissue PD-L1: HR, 6.96; 95% CI, 2.48–19.6; P = 0.0002 vs. serum sPD-L1: HR, 8.7; 95% CI, 3.16–23.9; P < 0.0001) for the GC patients. Furthermore, infiltrative CD8- and Foxp3-positive T cells were significantly increased in the GC patients with elevated tissue PD-L1 expression. Conclusion: Both serum sPD-L1 and tissue PD-L1 expression may serve as predictive biomarkers for recurrence and prognosis in GC patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)876-883
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15-03-2019
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Soluble PD-L1 Expression in Circulation as a Predictive Marker for Recurrence and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer: Direct Comparison of the Clinical Burden Between Tissue and Serum PD-L1 Expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this