TY - JOUR
T1 - Spinal cord injury following aortic arch replacement
AU - Tokuda, Yoshiyuki
AU - Fujimoto, Kazuro
AU - Narita, Yuji
AU - Mutsuga, Masato
AU - Terazawa, Sachie
AU - Ito, Hideki
AU - Matsumura, Yasumoto
AU - Uchida, Wataru
AU - Munakata, Hisaaki
AU - Ashida, Shinichi
AU - Ono, Tsukasa
AU - Nishi, Toshihiko
AU - Yano, Daisuke
AU - Ishida, Shinichi
AU - Kuwabara, Fumiaki
AU - Akita, Toshiaki
AU - Usui, Akihiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Purpose: Postoperative spinal cord injury is a devastating complication after aortic arch replacement. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of this complication. Methods: A group of 254 consecutive patients undergoing aortic arch replacement via median sternotomy, with (n = 78) or without (n = 176) extended replacement of the upper descending aorta, were included in a risk analysis. The frozen elephant trunk technique was used in 46 patients. The patients’ atherothrombotic lesions (extensive intimal thickening of > 4 mm) were identified from computed tomography images. Results: Complete paraplegia (n = 7) and incomplete paraparesis (n = 4) occurred immediately after the operation (permanent spinal cord injury rate, 1.97%; transient spinal cord injury rate, 2.36%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the use of the frozen elephant trunk technique (odds ratio 36.3), previous repair of thoracoabdominal aorta or descending aorta (odds ratio 29.4), proximal atherothrombotic aorta (odds ratio 9.6), chronic obstructive lung disease (odds ratio 7.1) and old age (odds ratio 1.1) as predictors of spinal cord injury (p < 0.0001, area under curve 0.93). Conclusions: Spinal cord injury occurs with a non-negligible incidence following aortic arch replacement. The full objective assessment of the morphology of the whole aorta and the recognition of the risk factors are mandatory.
AB - Purpose: Postoperative spinal cord injury is a devastating complication after aortic arch replacement. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of this complication. Methods: A group of 254 consecutive patients undergoing aortic arch replacement via median sternotomy, with (n = 78) or without (n = 176) extended replacement of the upper descending aorta, were included in a risk analysis. The frozen elephant trunk technique was used in 46 patients. The patients’ atherothrombotic lesions (extensive intimal thickening of > 4 mm) were identified from computed tomography images. Results: Complete paraplegia (n = 7) and incomplete paraparesis (n = 4) occurred immediately after the operation (permanent spinal cord injury rate, 1.97%; transient spinal cord injury rate, 2.36%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the use of the frozen elephant trunk technique (odds ratio 36.3), previous repair of thoracoabdominal aorta or descending aorta (odds ratio 29.4), proximal atherothrombotic aorta (odds ratio 9.6), chronic obstructive lung disease (odds ratio 7.1) and old age (odds ratio 1.1) as predictors of spinal cord injury (p < 0.0001, area under curve 0.93). Conclusions: Spinal cord injury occurs with a non-negligible incidence following aortic arch replacement. The full objective assessment of the morphology of the whole aorta and the recognition of the risk factors are mandatory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069500181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069500181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-019-01853-2
DO - 10.1007/s00595-019-01853-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 31332530
AN - SCOPUS:85069500181
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 50
SP - 106
EP - 113
JO - Surgery Today
JF - Surgery Today
IS - 2
ER -