Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Yuji Akiyama, T. Iwaya, F. Endo, Y. Shioi, T. Chiba, T. Takahara, K. Otsuka, H. Nitta, K. Koeda, M. Mizuno, Y. Kimura, A. Sasaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the outcome of hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis during radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The outcomes of 467 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using interrupted and double-layered sutures after radical esophagectomy via right thoracotomy or thoracoscopic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Anastomotic leakage, including conduit necrosis, occurred in 11 of 467 patients (2.4%); 7 of 11 (63.6%) cases experienced only minor leakage, whereas the other four (36.4%) patients had major leakage that required surgical or radiologic intervention, including two patients of conduit necrosis. Anastomotic leakages were more frequently observed after retrosternal reconstruction compared with the posterior mediastinal route (P < 0.0001). The median time to healing of leakage was 40 days (range: 14-97 days). Two patients (2/467, 0.4%) died in the hospital due to sepsis caused by the leakage and conduit necrosis. Twelve patients (2.6%) developed anastomotic stenosis, which was improved by dilatation in all patients. Hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a stable and highly safe method of radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalDiseases of the Esophagus
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-05-2017
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this